Second, you continue to overlook the facts to make your point. Those on the Sexual offenders list are not suspects, they are convicted. They have had their due process. You want all of us to be speaking of lynching while we are speaking of punishment befitting the crime of those convicted.
Personally, I don’t care what others think about the posts on FR when it comes to pedophiles. Let them sweat because if they are, it might make them think that the father of the child they are dreaming about will make sure they never see a jail cell or see it lacking sexual organs. After conviction, that is.
> First, what kind of Threat are you seeing?
It makes me wonder after my backround in Psych what you are seeing.
OK I’ll spell it out. You said in Post #80:
> Continue to champion for the molester and then explain your way out of it and many here will make assumptions about you too.
That to me sounds like a “shut-up-or-else.”
> Personally, I don’t care what others think about the posts on FR when it comes to pedophiles.
The Liberals love that attitude! Go on and feed ‘em more! Say whatever you like, in whatever context you like — they don’t actually care what you think either, so long as it makes us Conservatives look extreme... they live for this stuff, so feed it to ‘em, ay!
As the Bard said, “All the world’s a stage, And all the men and women merely players: They have their exits and their entrances...”
Perhaps you have, for your time on stage, decided to be loud and to call attention to ideas that the Liberals would love to be able to pin upon Conservatives: that’s fine, I guess. None of us is bigger than the wider play. Those seem to be your lines, so recite them with my blessing. ‘Tis, after all, your time on stage...