You are no doubt right. Everyone (including me) who believes the police MAY have arrested the right man based on evidence is an ignorant, overzealous, maniacal fool.
We are peasants with pitchforks after the wrong man, because we are idiots who only look at a person’s appearance.
The police arrested the wrong man, and you are certain of that.
Thanks for clearing that up.
> The police arrested the wrong man, and you are certain of that.
The police arrested a *suspect*, I am certain of *that*. And I am certain that the suspect is deemed to be innocent until proven guilty under the American judicial system — you know, the one where the accused stands before an impartial judge, and a jury of 12 of his peers get to hear evidence and decide his guilt or otherwise?
> We are peasants with pitchforks after the wrong man, because we are idiots who only look at a person’s appearance.
You said it, not me.
> You are no doubt right. Everyone (including me) who believes the police MAY have arrested the right man based on evidence is an ignorant, overzealous, maniacal fool.
If you insist on cramming words into my mouth and telling me I’m right, then I guess I gotta concede your point: you are an ignorant, overzealous, maniacal fool, an idiot and a peasant with a pitchfork. You said it, not me.
Until the courts have had their say maybe you yahoos ought to keep your ropes and lynch parties under control, ay. There will be time enough for a necktie party if a guilty verdict comes in.
*DieHard*