Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teen to be charged in Weare sex case
The Union Leader ^ | September 28, 2007 | Greta Cuyler

Posted on 09/28/2007 10:41:38 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 last
To: Past Your Eyes

The principal is wrong for trying to keep school safe?

Having some enraged person beat up somebody is not a safe environment....


121 posted on 09/28/2007 7:25:25 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Dick Cheney should have gone hunting with Hillary." -- Yakov Smirnoff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #122 Removed by Moderator

To: Tax-chick
The traditional "white people riot" (as described by William Raspberry as a really serious law suit) against the principal and the school system would have been in order.

After all, the children were allowed to leave the school grounds, right?!

Guy could have gotten a new barn and a new gun with the court award, and paid someone else from a big city to come out and administer a REAL beating to the kid.

123 posted on 09/28/2007 7:52:13 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero
YOu mean the father has to agree to it first?

What a strange requirement ~ what's he do, fill out a form and get it notarized, or something.

124 posted on 09/28/2007 7:56:11 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
One of our Afghan neighbors had a teenage daughter/18, 19, and she had a boyfriend ('cause, I think, her mother felt the family should become Americanized).

Anyway, this poor guy used to show up in his SUV (which, turns out, is the ONLY vehicle Afghan males respect) and cruise very slowly past the house and she'd run out and open the door and hop in his moving vehicle.

No doubt the kid didn't want to become too good a target for poppa.

125 posted on 09/28/2007 7:59:50 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“YOu mean the father has to agree to it first?”

No, I mean be a rational and responsible human being.

I’m sure none of these hard-asses would have had sex if a girl had let them. They would have politely said “No thanks” and ran to the nearest confessional. /s


126 posted on 09/28/2007 10:35:19 PM PDT by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

“Trust me, they were doing it back in the early 1970’s and that was well be for billjeffclinton.”

As I’m well aware from personal experience. There were even girls back then who didn’t consider oral sex “sex.”


127 posted on 09/29/2007 3:00:31 AM PDT by gracesdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

Difference being, Dad is old enough to understand the consequences of his actions. Is the 17 year old boyfriend man enough to handle the consequences of premarital sex, a pregnancy or STD, with his 15 year old girlfriend? Or do you think he would cut and run and leave the mess he made to Dad?


128 posted on 09/29/2007 3:26:51 AM PDT by tuffydoodle (Shut up voices, or I'll poke you with a Q-Tip again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
I took after one of my daughter's scumbag boyfriends with a iron pipe, once. I bet he never ran so hard in his whole sorry life.........

Very naive ones.......I cannot understand her. Each “boyfriend” she’s had is worse than the previous one......She seems to go out of her way to find the absolute worst human debris she can find...............

What's so very sad, for you and your daughter, is that you don't even see the correlation.

129 posted on 09/29/2007 4:40:12 AM PDT by NCSteve (I am not arguing with you - I am telling you. -- James Whistler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

what kind of reception did she find upon return


130 posted on 09/29/2007 5:40:42 AM PDT by elpadre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle

I disagree. The 17 year old assault victim in a few months could serve in the armed services. He seems like a typical 17 year old.

Dad appears to have some issues. Dad is not mature enough to keep his emotions in check, to the point of assaulting a minor. It would not surprise me if his retaliation stemmed from his own embarrassment. His daughter is now the “easy” girl.

I think it is interesting to see how many people rage against honor killings. Yet, a great majority support this fathers actions. This enraged father could have easily killed that boy.


131 posted on 09/29/2007 5:48:45 AM PDT by Paulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

“When they married, he was 32 years old and she was just a shade over 13.”

Dude, that is weird. However, it was probably a lot more common(much earlier) than many think.


132 posted on 09/29/2007 5:52:55 AM PDT by Paulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: tuffydoodle
Difference being, Dad is old enough to understand the consequences of his actions.

Thank you for reinforcing my point.

The kids did what kids do. Yes, sex amongst teens is fairly normal behavior.

What dad did was intentional and premeditated. He planned and executed a bodily attack on the kid.

He should have known better, but he did it anyway regardless of the consequences.

Not saying he really needs to go to jail, as a battery conviction and probation will probably do the trick and I doubt he'll beat the next boy that his daughter beds.

133 posted on 09/29/2007 8:25:40 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (If you agree with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
She survived.

The Moustache Pete's from the old country (around here) just don't want the pukes parking in the drive, or near the house (for very long), but they know time are changing and nobody they know is going back to Kabul.

134 posted on 09/29/2007 1:51:13 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: WL-law
Typically, where a 15 y.o. is involved, the statutes require that the male be 3 years or more older to establish the crime.

Watch it there. No statutory rape law makes a distinction based on gender and if one did, it wouldn't be enforceable. The older of the two must generally be two or three years older - whether it's the male or female.

135 posted on 09/29/2007 3:35:01 PM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6
Dear LTC8K6:

I guess my mother and father were different. The rules were the same for the boys and the girls in our house. We were all held accountable for our actions.

Doesn't mean that my mother didn't hover over me like a fretful hawk; she did. Doesn't mean my father didn't growl at boyfriends; he did. They just realized it took two to tango - and I wasn't allowed to dance if I wanted them to respect me.

136 posted on 09/30/2007 5:48:37 PM PDT by TheWriterTX (Proud Retrosexual Wife of 14 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson