Posted on 09/28/2007 10:41:38 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes
WEARE – A 17-year-old Henniker boy who admitted to having sex with his 15-year-old girlfriend will "absolutely" be arrested for sexual assault, police said yesterday.
On top of the pending criminal charge, police said the 17-year-old also was beaten by the girl's father after the father learned the two had sex.
It was Monday, Sept. 10 when the girl's father stormed school property and attacked the boy around 3 p.m., according to Turmelle.
The principal said he's upset at the number of people who have sided with the father over this incident.
"We all work so hard to give our kids a safe place to go to," he said. "Any time we have an act of violence, it's very upsetting because it is completely antithetical to what we're trying to accomplish."
(Excerpt) Read more at unionleader.com ...
The principal is wrong for trying to keep school safe?
Having some enraged person beat up somebody is not a safe environment....
After all, the children were allowed to leave the school grounds, right?!
Guy could have gotten a new barn and a new gun with the court award, and paid someone else from a big city to come out and administer a REAL beating to the kid.
What a strange requirement ~ what's he do, fill out a form and get it notarized, or something.
Anyway, this poor guy used to show up in his SUV (which, turns out, is the ONLY vehicle Afghan males respect) and cruise very slowly past the house and she'd run out and open the door and hop in his moving vehicle.
No doubt the kid didn't want to become too good a target for poppa.
“YOu mean the father has to agree to it first?”
No, I mean be a rational and responsible human being.
I’m sure none of these hard-asses would have had sex if a girl had let them. They would have politely said “No thanks” and ran to the nearest confessional. /s
“Trust me, they were doing it back in the early 1970’s and that was well be for billjeffclinton.”
As I’m well aware from personal experience. There were even girls back then who didn’t consider oral sex “sex.”
Difference being, Dad is old enough to understand the consequences of his actions. Is the 17 year old boyfriend man enough to handle the consequences of premarital sex, a pregnancy or STD, with his 15 year old girlfriend? Or do you think he would cut and run and leave the mess he made to Dad?
Very naive ones.......I cannot understand her. Each “boyfriend” she’s had is worse than the previous one......She seems to go out of her way to find the absolute worst human debris she can find...............
What's so very sad, for you and your daughter, is that you don't even see the correlation.
what kind of reception did she find upon return
I disagree. The 17 year old assault victim in a few months could serve in the armed services. He seems like a typical 17 year old.
Dad appears to have some issues. Dad is not mature enough to keep his emotions in check, to the point of assaulting a minor. It would not surprise me if his retaliation stemmed from his own embarrassment. His daughter is now the “easy” girl.
I think it is interesting to see how many people rage against honor killings. Yet, a great majority support this fathers actions. This enraged father could have easily killed that boy.
“When they married, he was 32 years old and she was just a shade over 13.”
Dude, that is weird. However, it was probably a lot more common(much earlier) than many think.
Thank you for reinforcing my point.
The kids did what kids do. Yes, sex amongst teens is fairly normal behavior.
What dad did was intentional and premeditated. He planned and executed a bodily attack on the kid.
He should have known better, but he did it anyway regardless of the consequences.
Not saying he really needs to go to jail, as a battery conviction and probation will probably do the trick and I doubt he'll beat the next boy that his daughter beds.
The Moustache Pete's from the old country (around here) just don't want the pukes parking in the drive, or near the house (for very long), but they know time are changing and nobody they know is going back to Kabul.
Watch it there. No statutory rape law makes a distinction based on gender and if one did, it wouldn't be enforceable. The older of the two must generally be two or three years older - whether it's the male or female.
I guess my mother and father were different. The rules were the same for the boys and the girls in our house. We were all held accountable for our actions.
Doesn't mean that my mother didn't hover over me like a fretful hawk; she did. Doesn't mean my father didn't growl at boyfriends; he did. They just realized it took two to tango - and I wasn't allowed to dance if I wanted them to respect me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.