I heard Laura’s show today, & I’m certainly confused. A woman called in and said it’s in the Bible in Leviticus that tattoos should not be done, Laura talked to the woman, quoted the verse out of the Bible and then said, before this discussion today is over I’m going to be coming out in favor of Tattoos. Was that her way of saying that she’s against Christianity? It was just sooooo weird, the way the conversation went down. I hope Media Matters doesn’t catch her up in this, it wouldn’t sound good.
I read on a blog today that Richard Land is THE spokesman for the Southern Baptists, is that true?
What is the proper way to characterize his statements? As his own, As a powerful leader within the SB, AS an official statement from the SB?
Is this as close as we will get to a hinted endorsement from the SB?
I would like to know as formal a classification as you can give me, so that when I use it in conversation I am being accurate.
It was a nice interview unfortunately the phone banks died and Lamb’s cell phone connection died.
It was a nice interview unfortunately the phone banks died and Lamb’s cell phone connection died.
The nazis tattooed concentration camp victims. Thanks, but no thanks.