[Eroteme]

I agree. See post 19 for where I think the big money went.

It strains all logic to imagine that the WSJ's article about the Paws coincidentally came out at the precise time that the Ponzi scheme collapsed. It makes much more sense that the WSJ article was the precipitating event. The handlers got spooked and pulled the money, leaving Hsu to hang out to dry.

[Enchante]

"It strains all logic to imagine that the WSJ's article about the Paws coincidentally came out at the precise time that the Ponzi scheme collapsed. It makes much more sense that the WSJ article was the precipitating event. The handlers got spooked and pulled the money, leaving Hsu to hang out to dry."

Yes, it would seem far more likely that the WSJ article spooked the handlers who then pulled away funds than to think that the scheme just happened to collapse on its own at the very moment that the WSJ wrote about the Tinkle Paw connection. Now one big question is can anyone get Hsu to talk? IF the feds worked it right they should be able to do so, but with all the Clintonistas burrowed in, who knows whether any approvals will be given to offer him a deal, even put him in Witness Protection, etc.