Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: holdonnow

WHAT ABOUT TERRI SHIVO?


222 posted on 09/26/2007 4:38:56 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks ( BUILD THE WALL, ENFORCE THE LAW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies ]


To: Clint N. Suhks

Conyers’ own words:

Casting Aside the Separation of Powers
By John Conyers, Jr.
t r u t h o u t | Statement

Sunday 20 March 2005

By passing this bill, in this form, we will be intruding in the most sensitive possible family decision at the most ill-opportune time. It will be hard for this member to envision a case or circumstance that Congress will not be willing to involve itself in under this precedent.

By passing legislation which takes sides in an ongoing legal dispute, we will be casting aside the principle of separation of powers. We will be abandoning our role as a serious legislative branch, and take on the role not only of Judge, but of Doctor, Priest, Parent and Spouse.

By passing legislation which wrests jurisdiction away from a state judge and sends it to a single preselected federal court, we will abandon any pretense of federalism. The concept of a Jeffersonian Democracy as envisioned by the founders, and the states as “laboratories of democracy” as articulated by Justice Brandeis will lie in tatters.

By passing this legislation, in the complete absence of hearings or a committee markup, and with no opportunity for amendments, in complete violation of what we used to call “regular order,” we will send a signal that the usual rules of conduct and procedure no longer apply when they are inconvenient to the Majority Party.

By passing this legislation, and taking this sensitive decision away from a spouse and giving it to a federal court, we will make it abundantly clear that all the talk last year about marriage being a “sacred trust between a man and a woman” was just that - talk.

My friends on the other side of the aisle will declare that this legislation is about principle, and morals and values.

But if this legislation was only about principle, why would the Majority party be distributing talking points in the other body declaring that “this is a great political issue” and that by passing this bill, “the pro-life base will be excited.”?

http://www.truthout.org/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/38/9769


227 posted on 09/26/2007 4:42:08 PM PDT by hattend ("Courage is being scared to death and saddling up anyway." - John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson