Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wbill
I think the difference is this: during WW II many people believed that it was insensitive and tasteless to have a huge, lavish, costly public celebration when fellow citizens were worried for their sons and daughters and grieving for the dead. These young men and women (the nurses) were in danger because they were fighting for a common good, a good that would benefit all.

They still are. But do any of those sentiments register now? How many bridezillas, liberal or conservative, are willing to wear a pretty dress that costs less, and have a buffet instead of the same lavish sit-down with all the bells and whistles, and donate the rest of the money to the wounded veterans, or for body armour, if that is still needed?

Since theme weddings are so in vogue, why not a WW II-style wedding?

Something else. It's funny in retrospect, but very touching.

When I got engaged my NY Jewish liberal friend Sandy dropped in, looking grim. Sandy is my mother's age, and she remembers the war. She sat me down, and the lecture began. She began by telling me that I was now in a different role than the usual fiancée. I had to think and live differently. To paraphrase:
"Nothing you do and nothing that happens to you or the kids is important. If you break your ankle, he doesn't have to know about it. If one of the kids gets into trouble, don't bother him with it. If the kitchen catches fire, deal with it. The same goes for the kids. Be cheerful and funny. He needs that. Listen to him when he talks. I mean LISTEN. Don't forget he's where the fighting is. I heard him tell your cousin a mortar came through his tent. Lucky he wasn't there. He needs to focus on his safety and the safety of his men. He can't have his attention wandering because he's thinking about some trivial c*rap going on with you. He'll probably forget your birthday, the kids' birthdays, your anniversary and everything else. His mind will be on other things. You chose to marry a soldier. Deal with it."

I thought I heard the sound of Big Band music, and that if I looked in the mirror the face that looked back would be wearing red lipstick, hair encased in a snood. It was like a scene out of a very bad movie. For all that, Sandy's WW II-era advice was spot-on. And bless her heart, she was there for us.

96 posted on 09/27/2007 12:11:28 PM PDT by Fiona MacKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Fiona MacKnight
I think the difference is this: during WW II many people believed that
it was insensitive and tasteless to have a huge, lavish,
costly public celebration when fellow citizens were worried for
their sons and daughters and grieving for the dead.


I admit that in segment on the "homefront" response to the announcement
of the D-Day landings, I was suprised when it was said that alcohol
sales were suspended in Atlanta for a day (IIRC).
At first I thought the announcement would be an occasion for
at least one celebratory beer...but I guess I wasn't there to understand
the tension over whether the landing would really take hold and drive
on into Germany.
Things were sufficiently fearful that it was a time to head to
church/temple to offer prayer.
(Which Burns, to his credit, did include, along with a bit of FDR's
imprecatory prayer for D-Day)
102 posted on 09/27/2007 3:15:06 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson