I don’t know, but the “privacy stature” they are being tried on was designed two years ago to prevent men from taking pictures of girls in the bathroom.
This statute was never used until the present time for any “homosexual hunts.” It was used by the airport people and rounded up fifty or so individuals—none of whom asked for or acted in a sexual manner.
My understanding is that there are homo websites that, if one is inclined, lists local public facilities where this activity occurs. This airport bathroom was notorious for such activity. That's why the cops had an ongoing sting. Vice cops are paid to know the signs. I find it hard to believe that they just arrested 40 guys for using the bathroom. Maybe it's me, but I've used public restrooms for over 40 years and I've never touched another man's foot.
It's clear that Craig did not cop a plea to this statute.
Now will you please direct me to your source? Where did you read that 40 or 50 others who were arrested during that bathroom sting were charged with MSS 609.746 (interference with privacy) and where did you read that they are taking it to trial rather than plea?
It's clear that Craig did not cop a plea to this statute.
Now will you please direct me to your source? Where did you read that 40 or 50 others who were arrested during that bathroom sting were charged with MSS 609.746 (interference with privacy) and where did you read that they are taking it to trial rather than plea?