I don't know, I'll probably starve, I guess.
As I'm mentioned to you before, we'll get to see the political acumen of FR's Paul supporters put to the test.
I don't care about the Paul supporters here. I'm talking about the thousands that exist outside of this website. The folks that got you guys in serious denial.
Of course not. You’d never shill for Paul. And he gets no support at all from truthers, anti-war folk, or haters. That’s just an internet thing, and we all know the internet isn’t reliable. Is that why Paul’s supporters tout his internet performance?
It's been explained to you a million times that there is a relatively small minority of fringe individuals that are trying to exploit Paul's campaign. Now if you want to believe that Paul's support entirely consists of truthers, nutjobs, neo-Nazis, and skinheads, that's your perogative but the folks at the rallies and in the audience says otherwise.
Oh, please, the whining accomplishes nothing. I’ll stand by everything I’ve said about Ron Paul. For your own credibility, please provide links to 5 of my photoshops.
No whining, I'm just pointing out that actions have consequences, like Paul's supporters not supporting the GOP nominee, that's all.
Then he needs to turn the thousands into millions and clearly disassociate himself and his campaign from the less savory parts of the internet realm who support him. I wouldn't support him for that, but it would restore some level of respect. I believe I've cited to you the indicted drug dealer in Canada organizing meetings. Is a drug dealer and a dozen of his pals important, no. But when a political campaign is asked about the support of someone under indictment, the Paul campaign response that we'll take support from anywhere is unacceptable in my mind. In fact a disqualifier, because in the highly unlikely event a politician like that were successful, those early supporters would be the only he'd have a moral obligation to.