I have seen the photo in question. There is no doubt that they’re under 18. More like 5 year olds.
Alright, I’ll believe you cause I don’t feel like looking it up or looking at it for that matter. That stuff is so sick and twisted... ‘art’ is no excuse, I’ll even call inflated black trash bags ‘art’ before I’ll ever admit that child porn is artistic.
> I have seen the photo in question. There
> is no doubt that they’re under 18. More
> like 5 year olds.
This puts the police in an interesting position. Given that they have charged people with the possession of child porn for having much less shocking images (eg. children on the beach) then if they let this one go, they’re rather going against the entire direction of their recent policy. And yet if the go after Sir Elton, they’ll be going after a popular figure, and they risk jury nullification...