Diane compared apples to oranges. It's not only "the Americans," as companies from other countries are also victims of Alberta's bait-and-switch scheme. ..."royalties," taxes--same thing in this case. And it appears that Diane is proud of what her province will probably have in common with Venezuela soon.
1 posted on
09/24/2007 1:44:01 PM PDT by
familyop
To: bruinbirdman
Ping! This should be interesting. Alberta's wanting to hike taxes on oil sands companies to ~ 64%, IIRC.
Info:
Diane Francis
dfrancis@nationalpost.com
2 posted on
09/24/2007 1:48:03 PM PDT by
familyop
(The best that we can do is to try to do better today than we did yesterday.)
conventional oil and gas royalties and taxes in the U.S. average 67%
~ ~ bump ~ ~
3 posted on
09/24/2007 1:48:37 PM PDT by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: familyop
Royalties aren’t the same as taxes. They are payments made for the resources extracted. If the land, and all sub-surface rights were sold outright, the cost wouldn’t be mistaken for a tax. Like a sale, royalties are a payment for a transfer of property rights.
That said, a deal is a deal. Existing active leaseholders should be exempted from any increase in royalties.
To: familyop
All those “tar sands” would be worth less than zilch without mega-billion dollar investments to mine and process the stuff.
It’s ridulous to make a straight-up comparison to other locales where the cost of extraction/processing is far lower.
13 posted on
09/24/2007 2:28:29 PM PDT by
Enchante
(Democrat terror-fighting motto: "bleat, cheat, retreat & defeat, just suck on liberal teat")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson