Posted on 09/24/2007 7:41:08 AM PDT by 3AngelaD
I give up. Because they need to own shares in NYT to bump their I-hate-Bush-more-than-you-do creds?
We were way overstocked with ammo already, but in fighting the "Living Dead" Zombies of the MSM, I guess having a little more can't hurt.
We have so much that there are ammunition depots across the country full to the brim with New York Times-bashing materials, much of which dates back to the war in Vietnam when the Leftists accomplished their takeover of our country and its media.
The New York Times admitting the obvious, they always give preferential treatment to liberals.
Blue markings on munitions indicate training devices.
>>>MoveOn.org may really have had no reason to know what the “normal” ad rate was. If I were to call the NY Times and they quoted a price to me for advertising, I’d have no way of knowing whether I was paying a “normal” or “discounted” rate.
I don’t know if this is what happened; but, anytime I want to run an ad in a publication or radio venue, the first thing the media outlet does is send me a media kit. The media kit lists all their ad options with pricing.
I have an idea it took about as long as some big advertisers to let them know they wouldn't be advertising for a while - added to, it just may be violating law for a newspaper to aid and abet such slander = of anyone, let alone a General in the midst of a war???
By giving them more than 50 percent off, they were, basically, running the ad pro bono...which makes them an active partner
Pravda on the Hudson is lying again!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.