[geezerwheezer]

Quite a few of the colleges listed really just suck. The magazine would do us a real favor listing them by the number of weirdos, flakes, commies, lesbians, homosexuals, fake Indians, atheists,& tree huggers there that are teaching at each of these schools. That would be a real bonus section in any magazine! (not to mention “global warming scientists” too!)

[SirLinksalot]

The magazine would do us a real favor listing them by the number of weirdos, flakes, commies, lesbians, homosexuals, fake Indians, atheists,& tree huggers there that are teaching at each of these schools.

This is what makes the Princeton Review a better source. It actually does that --- list the colleges according to whether there are a lot of discussions in class or not, whether schools like to party, whether schools are religious, whether students long for the days of Ronald Reagan, whether the food is good, whether students are liberal or conservative, how good the career service and placement records are, how rigorous the academics are, how satisfied the students are with the value of their education, etc., etc. and many more...

US News and World Report just does not go into that detail.