Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perchant

You really need to review the time line:
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/politics/THOMPSON_DOCS/thompson_records.pdf

It really does appear that they were paying him to talk on the phone.

The bills after November 1, 1991 were 0.2 hours here to 0.4 hours there for “telephone conference with DeSarno,” a couple of which were followed up with 0.7 and 0.2 hrs “review of documents.” All mention of the “Administration official” ended October 10, 1991.


123 posted on 09/24/2007 4:40:36 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: hocndoc
You really need to review the time line:

I've reviewed the time line and the abortionist was a client of Thompson's at least up until August 1992. It seems kind of risky to assume that Thompson was serving his client in some sort of innocuous capacity. The abortionist is holding all the cards...and who knows what choice documents.

125 posted on 09/24/2007 7:38:15 PM PDT by Perchant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson