You can shuck and jive, use smoke and mirrors, engage in obfuscation and misdirection but it will never conceal the fact that 12 jurors ruled R&C shot OVD without justifiable cause. Everything is a sideshow. If it is found that the underlying basis for the 10 year mandatory was without merit, that conviction may be removed but the others will remain.
“When you got the facts on your side, pound the facts. When you got the law, pound the law, when you got neither, pound the table.”
I’m surprised you’re table hasn’t buckled from all the pounding.
Is that the same standard you apply to the OJ jury?
Absolutely incorrect. You have either still failed to read the brief, or are unable to comprehend it. The result is the same--you're wrong.
I’m surprised you’re table hasn’t buckled from all the pounding.
Coming from someone who has been proven wrong on thread after thread, this is almost amusing. Mostly, it's tiresome.
It's pretty clear that you, Bob J, are all for open borders. Anyone who thinks these agents committed a crime is simply delusional. LEOs shooting a drug smuggler should be given a medal, not brought to trial. This whole trial was done as a kiss ass move to appease Mexico's government, as are the other cases that have been brought against LEOs enforcing border law.
As for your remark posted here about a jury finding them guilty so they must be guilty, a jury found OJ not guilty and we know how phony that was.
Just because a jury convicts doesn't mean they got it right. Lot's of people have been set free due to DNA evidence that proved the jury had been mislead. Juries can be manipulated, and this one was.