[CharlesWayneCT]

Thanks. In all seriousness, I did not respond to anything I had already responded to, although I did respond to points I missed in previous posts.

I still assert you attacked me for posting to the thread, but I don’t assert you attacked me in the ways you claim you didn’t here, so we are in agreement at least on your claims.

I was unaware of what you wanted me to respond to, which is why I asked if you would re-post the questions you wanted answered, but when you said I should just go back and look, I took that apparently too literally.

At least I think I’ve learned a little bit in this thread, even if it wasn’t about the appeal.

Thanks.

[calcowgirl]

Well, here is new news... straight from the court docket.

 
9/25/07   Case tentatively calendared for oral argument   Week of:
          12/03/07. [06-51489, 06-51490] (gam) [06-51489 06-51490]