The report is an investigative report that includes the statement of the two men that implicated Davila. There is no evidence that the report contains any other evidence. I haven’t seen Hunter specify any other evidence, or any otehr person who claims to have seen the report.
The report is just another statement of the same claim reported first by WND and then by a lot of other papers. But it’s all the SAME piece of evidence.
A report of a claim is not an additional piece of evidence.
If you write something, and I quote you, that’s not corrobaration.
If there is other evidence, it may convince me you are right. But until I see the other evidence, what I know is not enough for me to even state that Davila smuggled a 2nd load, much less attack Sutton for not putting him in prison for it.
But that’s what others want to do, ruin Sutton because he hasn’t imprisoned Davila when there is no evidence of any facts that would allow him to do so.
Well at least you now acknowledge that there WAS a report!
Your prior comment:
there was no EVIDENCE of a 2nd bust, only a story in the WND