I never claimed he was falsely accused of the 2nd load. I claimed that the only evidence was the word of the guy caught with the drugs. I claimed that the story of his brother was clearly false. I’ve claimed he was not arrested, that he was not indicted, that he was not “caught”, and that there was no evidence he drove a van of drugs over the border.
but I’ve NEVER claimed he was “falsely accused”.
I’ve been consistant here. My objection is people taking conjecture and presenting it as fact, and people jumping to conclusions or stating things as true when they are false.
I don’t even mind if people want to believe that Davila did a 2nd load. I only object to using that “belief” to then assert that Sutton is therefore lying about it, hiding it, or has some deal with Davilas to give him immunity for it.
Until you have some real proof that the story is true, it is just an opinion based on weak evidence. That doesn’t make it false, but fully explains why Davila isn’t sitting in jail right now.
Let me go about this in a new way. What possible purpose could Johnny Sutton have for refusing to answer the question, "is there any evidence of Davila's involvement with another drug trafficking incident in Oct 05" IF the answer of that question is "NO"?
The only justifiable reason for Sutton to refuse to clear the smuggler of involvement in the second load in front of the Senate and national radio audiences is -- The October 05 incident was part of a sting and Davila was working for the government even back then, before the Ramos & Compean trial. That didn't happen and even I'd be shocked if they fabricated that falsehood as part of their cover up.