Skip to comments.
Ron Paul = Hillary on the War; Rudy Giuliani = Hillary on abortion, etc
Vanity
| Jim Robinson
Posted on 09/23/2007 10:53:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-139 next last
To: Jim Robinson
The Ahmedinajad thread on ronpaulforumsdotcom today was quite disturbing. L.Ron has some very sickening followers, and seems to be unwilling to repudiate them.
81
posted on
09/24/2007 4:19:27 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
To: Maynerd
Reagan was not about Republicanism, he was about Conservatism. He ran against a moderate sitting Republican POTUS....it was all about conservatism.
82
posted on
09/24/2007 4:22:17 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
To: Allegra; wideawake; dirtboy; jdm; RockinRight; ejonesie22; perfect_rovian_storm
Abortionists, liberals, RINOs, and antiwar activists can kiss my ass. Dont need them. Dont want them. --Jim Robinson
83
posted on
09/24/2007 4:26:07 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
To: James Deffenbach; SJackson; BlackElk; mnehrling
CAUTION PRECAUCION ATTENTION
VORSICHT ПРЕДУПРЕЖДЕНИЕ
주의 ATTENZIONE 注意 The Paulbearer Moonbattery Factor for this Thread HAS BEEN ELEVATED to
BLACK CHERRY
84
posted on
09/24/2007 4:34:24 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
To: Jim Robinson
Nice and concise. Couldn’t say it better myself.
85
posted on
09/24/2007 4:53:44 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(Thompson/Hunter 08 -- Fred08.com - The adults have joined the race.)
To: James Deffenbach
Rut roh.
This account has been banned or suspended.
Okay
86
posted on
09/24/2007 4:55:52 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: Kevmo
How is it he kept posting? Minor suspension?
87
posted on
09/24/2007 4:58:38 PM PDT
by
Kevmo
(We should withdraw from Iraq — via Tehran. And Duncan Hunter is just the man to get that job done.)
To: James Deffenbach
Sorry, all of that is complete BS. Paul says he does all those things and he is Jesus Christ of the Constitution in his own mind and in the mind of his followers, but this has all been analyzed in depth here on hundreds of threads.
Paul is a moderate libertarian who loves the sound of his own voice.
Ron Paul in a nutshell, is all about symbolism over substance. He cares more about symbolic votes that he claims are upholding the Constitution than the substance of those votes. He cared more about the symbolism of voting against funding our troops in the middle of battle than he cared about actually funding US Soldiers who were being shot at. Even most of the Democrats weren’t that stupid.
Ron Paul has rolled up the Constitution into a little flute and he is playing a tune, leading the gullible off the cliff, all for his own little game.
88
posted on
09/24/2007 5:05:00 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(Thompson/Hunter 08 -- Fred08.com - The adults have joined the race.)
To: stephenjohnbanker
Who is more hungry for power....Rudy or Hillary?Newt.
89
posted on
09/24/2007 5:15:05 PM PDT
by
carenot
(Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
To: Petronski
Reagan was not about Republicanism, he was about Conservatism. He ran against a moderate sitting Republican POTUS....it was all about conservatism.After Reagan lost the primary fight to Ford, he publicly supported Ford and one would logically assume voted for him.
I don't recall Reagan having a pity party and voting for a single issue candidate.
I'm a conservative, not a republican. But I'm not going to throw away my vote on a general election candidate that enables the GREATER of two evils to prevail.
90
posted on
09/24/2007 6:10:31 PM PDT
by
Maynerd
(What would Ronald Reagan do?)
To: Petronski
Tell me about, that was some crazy stuff...
91
posted on
09/24/2007 6:20:25 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: Petronski
92
posted on
09/24/2007 6:22:51 PM PDT
by
ejonesie22
(I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
To: jackieaxe
"jackieaxe (I'm voting for Ron Paul in spite of the Neocon/Big Government Republican propaganda!)"
So am I.
It doesn't take courage to agree with everyone else.
93
posted on
09/24/2007 6:29:46 PM PDT
by
carenot
(Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
To: Jim Robinson
And all three of them (Hillary, Kucinich and Ron Paul) are in league with the America-hating CodePinkO group and the World Socialist Partys International Answer.My goodness!
94
posted on
09/24/2007 6:39:50 PM PDT
by
carenot
(Proud member of The Flying Skillet Brigade)
To: Maynerd
After Reagan lost the primary fight to Ford, he publicly supported Ford and one would logically assume voted for him. I don't recall Reagan having a pity party and voting for a single issue candidate.
Actually, Ford blamed Reagan right up to his recent death for failing to campaign for him in a couple of narrowly decided states. Ford thought that would have made the difference but he thought Reagan held back, not wanting him elected to his own term in the WH. Who knows how much this is true or not. But Ford was bitter about that and about the conservative wing of the party insisting that he dump Nelson Rockefeller as his VP. He said he regretted that the most.
Well, it's off-topic but these high-stakes politicians hold a lot of grudges and have a lot of personal issues between them. It's part of their nature but it is played out larger in their lives because they perceive the stakes as so high, given how it is covered on TV and written into history. So bitterness from pols is probably the rule, not the exception.
95
posted on
09/24/2007 6:49:48 PM PDT
by
George W. Bush
(Apres moi, le deluge.)
To: George W. Bush
Agreed. I’ve read the same. Clearly Reagan didn’t beat the drums for Ford but he didn’t go third party either.
96
posted on
09/24/2007 7:25:10 PM PDT
by
Maynerd
(What would Ronald Reagan do?)
To: Jim Robinson
By the way, someone up thread has already pointed out that Ron Paul is really closer to the moonbat Dennis Kucinich on the war. And thats true. And all three of them (Hillary, Kucinich and Ron Paul) are in league with the America-hating CodePinkO group and the World Socialist Partys International Answer.
If Charlie Manson likes carrots and I like carrots, that does not make me a mass murderer. Same thing here. Yes, Ron Paul and the 2 demo dingbats you mentioned all oppose the war. This does not make Ron Paul a big government liberal democrat. Also, H*llary would be for the war if it thought it would get her the presidency, and Dennis K thinks we should surrender to the world, and divert the war money to handout programs to thugs and bums that don't work.
I no longer think this misadventure is worth it. PM Maliki came to Washington and expressed hope for a Hezbollah victory over Israel. If the best we can hope for is a pro-terrorist government in Iraq, let's go. There's validity to the argument that if it don't involve us, we shouldn't be looking to get involved. Yes, there's oil in the Middle East, but one brutal Arab dictator versus another, either way they have to sell us the oil. I barf when I read Saudi Arabia is our ally. In a round about way I'm getting to my point that there appears to be a lot of misinformed people who think Ron Paul should be a Democrat. George Bush and the Republican Congress grew the federal government between 2-3 times inflation with NCLB, free drugs for seniors and the lack of courage to cut a thing. Americorps is still funded for $250 million per year. Ron Paul voted against all this new spending. Actions speak louder than words. I'm voting for Ron Paul. I'm against continuing the Iraq War and the continued expansion of the federal government.
97
posted on
09/24/2007 7:33:09 PM PDT
by
jackieaxe
(I'm voting for Ron Paul in spite of the Neocon/Big Government Republican propaganda!)
To: jackieaxe
Look, jackass, he’s an antiwar moonbat. In case you don’t know it, Free Republic supports the war against the Islamic jihadists 100%. If FR is not your cup of tea, please leave. Meanwhile, you will not be dissing our conservative candidates or promoting antiwar moonbats on our forum where we support our troops and our commander in chief and their mission.
98
posted on
09/24/2007 7:54:59 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: Jim Robinson
99
posted on
09/24/2007 8:05:00 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(!! Warning, Quoting Ron Paul Supporters can be Hazardous to your Reputation !!)
To: jackieaxe
This account has been banned or suspended. These are becoming my favorite words.
100
posted on
09/24/2007 8:06:39 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(!! Warning, Quoting Ron Paul Supporters can be Hazardous to your Reputation !!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson