To: Graybeard58
It was just last week when Nathan's teacher's aide, Glenda Schiltz, filed a juvenile fourth degree misdemeanor assault charge against him. "What human being with a heart would do that to a six-year old?, asked Cathy Darnell, Nathan's mother. "Seriously, who would do that? I know I wouldn't."
Maybe someone who is tired of being physically attacked by an undisciplined brat? Maybe, Ms. Darnell, if you hadn't excused every bratty action by your spawn this would not have happened.
On, the other hand. Let's suppose that the kid cannot be trained not to attack other people. Let's suppose that his autism makes him untrainable. If that is the case he should be caged for life and fed through the bars, not inflicted on the public for he is an animal, not a human.
252 posted on
09/24/2007 4:57:54 PM PDT by
LibKill
To: LibKill
“Let’s suppose that his autism makes him untrainable. If that is the case he should be caged for life and fed through the bars, not inflicted on the public for he is an animal, not a human.”
Yes, and lets also suppose that you’re sterile so as not to pass on the stupid gene that must make your life so difficult.
To: LibKill
LibKill, You are definitely in the running.
282 posted on
09/24/2007 6:24:53 PM PDT by
New Perspective
(Proud father of a 3 year old son with Down Syndrome)
To: LibKill
Don’t tase me Oh swarmmy one, but what be yo mensa number wit all does intalligents coments.
293 posted on
09/24/2007 7:04:55 PM PDT by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
To: LibKill
Maybe someone who is tired of being physically attacked by an undisciplined brat? Maybe, Ms. Darnell, if you hadn't excused every bratty action by your spawn this would not have happened.
And I suppose people who suffer from turrets syndrome are just loud mouthed uncouth people who should hold their tongues.
Sheesh!
On, the other hand. Let's suppose that the kid cannot be trained not to attack other people.
He can, the person who was "attacked" was supposed to be a trainer, she failed in HER job.
Let's suppose that his autism makes him untrainable.
Why should we assume that which is provably false?
If that is the case he should be caged for life and fed through the bars, not inflicted on the public for he is an animal, not a human.
The same could be said / done to you if we forget reality and assume things that are provably false, but then you never expected your logic to place you on the "Wrong side of the bars".
374 posted on
09/25/2007 12:22:58 PM PDT by
DelphiUser
("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson