Sorry I was late posting them but I did the Christmas Cakes this morning and it took about an hour longer to prepare than I had budgeted.
Posted on 09/23/2007 4:57:33 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
Atleast this sunday, it will be OJ-free day. Whomever advising her to spam like this are going to regret bigtime.
To quote Gingrich, chances of that happening are about 80-20. Perhaps a little better on FNS but I still doubt it.
Hsu will get a pass, I’m sure, and Hillarycare II— actually with LE bringing on Leavitt it may get addressed but I doubt it will be challenged all that much. The plan is just so absurd and unAmerican— so much to the point that Edwards is now claiming credit for it.
I can think of a quite a few “world” leaders who support Mrs Clinton:
Osama Bin Laden
Ayman Zawahiri
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
Kim Il Jung
Sheik Hassan Nasrallah
Sheikh Ahmed Yassin
Hugo Chavez
Fidel Castro
The entire Poltiburo of the People’s Republic of China
HAHAHA! Oh so typical, move lips, lie. World leaders support people like Kerry because he goes to foreign lands and calls the United Stated an “international perhia (sp). I have been watching cspan this morning and someone called in to discuss that we need to be citizens of the world, not citizens of america. E-gads.
No doubt on that.
"I'll take less than 350 posts for $1,000 Alex".
"What? You mean Snugs will not be posting her always sumptuous dinner pictures"? "Can I double down on the $1,000"?
I think I'll call my dentist and see if I can schedule a root canal this morning.
LOL... it'll get thicker... just wait till you hear the reviews!
A link to another newsmaker as an intermission of wall to wall Clinton.
Osama’s latest:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUiNiB2yVCQ&eurl
The so-called leaders who would have supported him from - France, Germany, Canada, Sweden, Czech, Poland, Columbia are all gone.
Sorry I was late posting them but I did the Christmas Cakes this morning and it took about an hour longer to prepare than I had budgeted.
That’s actually a pretty good article, and he’s mostly right.
That being said, I have this inkling suspicion he may be doing this just to throw his hat into the ring.
AB's dictionary.
hellary is the one I usually use.
Bwahahahahaha!!!!!
The question is whether she will have rehearsed her responses to the advance copy of previously approved questions to avoid reading responses from her notes.
That’s OK— do we have a 4-10 this week?
Tavis Smiley is MSM’s Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton.
NM— found it.
Well, like it or not, Leavitt’s probably the only one in the bunch that’ll be willing and able to stand up against Hillarycare II.
President Bush used his Saturday Radio Address yesterday, which is totally ignored by the non-partisan /s media, to ask Congress to send him a reauthorization of the SCHIP program, that he can sign before it expires on Sept 30.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1900696/posts
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning.
In just eight days, the State Children’s Health Insurance Program — or “SCHIP” — is set to expire. This important program helps children whose families cannot afford private health insurance, but who do not qualify for Medicaid, to get the coverage they need. I strongly supported SCHIP as a governor, and have strongly supported it as President. My 2008 budget proposed to increase SCHIP funding by $5 billion over five years, a 20 percent increase over current funding.
Instead of working with my Administration to enact this funding increase for children’s health, Democrats in Congress have decided to pass a bill they know will be vetoed. One of their leaders has even said such a veto would be a “political victory.” As if this weren’t irresponsible enough, Congress is waiting until the SCHIP program is just about to expire before passing a final bill. In other words, Members of Congress are risking health coverage for poor children purely to make a political point.
The proposal congressional leaders are pushing would raise taxes on working Americans and would raise spending by $35 to $50 billion. Their proposal would result in taking a program meant to help poor children and turning it into one that covers children in some households with incomes of up to $83,000 a year. And their proposal would move millions of children who now have private health insurance into government-run health care. Our goal should be to move children who have no health insurance to private coverage — not to move children who already have private health insurance to government coverage.
-—snip-—
I wonder if Senator Clinton will be asked about this.
In this regard what is being said is a half truth not a full lie it is what is being implied that is the lie that the other candidates would not be treated similarly if they won.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.