To: COgamer; Salamander; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; All
"No scientist worth ANYTHING would ever present proof of a controversial theory. Even theories that are more or less proven remain labeled theories because other, as yet undiscovered, explanations could exist."
Try telling that to a Darwinist on a crevo thread.
102 posted on
09/23/2007 10:18:09 AM PDT by
shibumi
(".....panta en pasin....." - Origen)
To: shibumi
To: shibumi
Try telling that to a Darwinist on a crevo thread.I predict the 90%+ would be in complete agreement with the sentiment. As am I.
To: shibumi
Try telling that to a Darwinist on a crevo thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I think it would be the creationists who are more likely to DISAGREE with that post rather than the “Darwinist”, I presume that by Darwinist you mean someone who believes evolution is a more valid theory than creationism.
145 posted on
09/23/2007 2:20:18 PM PDT by
RipSawyer
(Does anybody still believe this is a free country?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson