Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COgamer; Salamander; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; All
"No scientist worth ANYTHING would ever present “proof” of a controversial theory. Even theories that are more or less “proven” remain labeled theories because other, as yet undiscovered, explanations could exist."


Try telling that to a Darwinist on a crevo thread.
102 posted on 09/23/2007 10:18:09 AM PDT by shibumi (".....panta en pasin....." - Origen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: shibumi

LOLOL!


106 posted on 09/23/2007 11:34:26 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: shibumi
Try telling that to a Darwinist on a crevo thread.

I predict the 90%+ would be in complete agreement with the sentiment. As am I.

114 posted on 09/23/2007 12:42:28 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

To: shibumi

Try telling that to a Darwinist on a crevo thread.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I think it would be the creationists who are more likely to DISAGREE with that post rather than the “Darwinist”, I presume that by Darwinist you mean someone who believes evolution is a more valid theory than creationism.


145 posted on 09/23/2007 2:20:18 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Does anybody still believe this is a free country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson