Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/22/2007 8:52:52 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: bruinbirdman

interesting.


162 posted on 09/23/2007 8:05:22 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
He argues that time travel shifts between different branches of reality, basing his claim on parallel universes, the so-called "many-worlds" formulation of quantum theory.

We probably switch our consciousness between parallel worlds all the time. For instance, I had never in my life seen OTC reading glasses at Walgreens and other drug stores until 1998. Of course, the fact that I didn't have any need of glasses until then could have something to do with it, but the parallel universe thing sounds much cooler.
171 posted on 09/24/2007 1:17:53 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Yeah, well if parallel universes exist, how come I’m trapped in the one in which I am still single, maddoggit?!


172 posted on 09/24/2007 1:28:19 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Hillary for President? In the words of Bell Biv DeVoe: "Never trust a big butt and a smile!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Quantum Mechanics makes my head hurt...

Mike

175 posted on 09/24/2007 5:59:01 AM PDT by MichaelP (The Big Picture IS important!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

According to Augustine (from “Confessions”)there is no such thing as the past or the future. There is only the present. The past is only the present-memory and the future is the present-expectation.


177 posted on 09/24/2007 6:18:00 AM PDT by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
Already been done:


179 posted on 09/24/2007 6:26:09 AM PDT by RockinRight (Can we start calling Fred "44" now, please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Yawn...another mis-phrased “news” story which prompts people to blather about wierd fantasies having no connection to the issue presented.


180 posted on 09/24/2007 6:35:17 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

While the author may truly mean that this notion has serious lab cred, to me it sounds more like dachshund crud.


184 posted on 09/24/2007 7:37:19 AM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

That explains a few things that have happened over the last few years - we got forked in time. ;)


201 posted on 09/24/2007 4:22:08 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
If there are infinite multiverses, then there are some interesting considerations:

1. If new multiverses are spawned off every time that a particle can assume more than one state, then it is not a question of whether or not you survive an accident. It becomes billions and billions of questions such as what happens if a particular electron in a particular atom in your shoulder jumps to a different state at the time your car hits the railing.

2. If multiverses are only spawned when an observation is made, then we had a single universe up until the time that the first sentient being was created. Before then there were no observations, unless we consider God an observer. If we are the only sentient beings, then was the first multiverse spawned when the first intelligent ape was formed? the first homo sapien? the first scientist? the first person to observe a quantum mechanical effect?

3. In most parallel universes when scientists perform the two slit experiment they see what we see: an interference pattern caused by a series of photons going in equal amounts through two different slits. However, in countless other universes there are a bunch of scientists who are still confused about why only 40% go through one slit and 60% through the other. And there is at least one universe where all the photons go through one slit or the other. How confused are they? Can they even do science in those universes? And why did we luck out and have a universe where quantum mechanics makes some measure of sense?

4. If every possible universe is possible then there is a being similar to me that goes from being Hitler-esque in one universe to nothing short of Mother Theresa in another. If the laws of physics require this to be so, then morality is a meaningless concept. No matter how good I am in this universe, I will be required to be evil in countless others thus negating any overall moral effect. If free will is superimposed upon quantum randomness, then it might be that if you averaged all the multiverses the average person would be better than expected due to God's influence ... or worse than average due to God allowing Satan to work his "charms" on all of the beings in all of the multiverses.

This is all quite silly.

203 posted on 09/24/2007 5:01:06 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman
The new work bolsters his claim that quantum theory does not forbid time travel. "It does sidestep it. You go into another universe,"

The double slit Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser is an experiment that has already been done and appears to prove you can change the quantum past without going into another universe.

 

205 posted on 09/24/2007 5:38:11 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

One problem, you can’t change your own parallel universe vis TT. So all you get is an infinity of models. Time wasted!


208 posted on 09/24/2007 9:15:39 PM PDT by gbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bruinbirdman

Since I’m not a scientist, I’ve had to think about this for awhile.

Is it possible that the feeling we get of deja vu isn’t really a “I’ve done this before” but a possible nanosecond aligning of the parellel universes where I (all of me) are doing the exact same thing at the exact same time, and a blending of ‘our’ consciousness?

Possible?


212 posted on 09/30/2007 8:04:59 PM PDT by Shadowstrike (Be polite, Be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson