Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather

And yet Bush claims that the DPRK have agreed to eliminate their nukes. What a joke of a President.


10 posted on 09/22/2007 7:38:04 PM PDT by KantianBurke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KantianBurke
What a joke...

Take it easy. Having new bases in Iraq is pretty cool - eh?

30 posted on 09/22/2007 7:47:29 PM PDT by Libloather (That's just what I need - some two-bit, washed up, loser politician giving me weather forecasts...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke

DUH!
Like Bush is going to tell YOU what he really knows.ha. ha.ha.

I can’t stand the “its Bush’s fault.!” and “Bush is dumb”.


44 posted on 09/22/2007 7:55:53 PM PDT by Recovering Ex-hippie (We need a troop surge in Philly and Newark!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke

What he says publicly and what he knows and is doing privately aren’t likely the same thing. This is the sort of issue that can’t be managed in broad daylight.


48 posted on 09/22/2007 7:56:57 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke
And yet Bush claims that the DPRK have agreed to eliminate their nukes. What a joke of a President.

Well. . . maybe they eliminated their nukes by selling 'em to the Syrians.

65 posted on 09/22/2007 8:05:15 PM PDT by ChicagoHebrew (Hell exists, it is real. It's a quiet green meadow populated entirely by Arab goat herders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke
And yet Bush claims that the DPRK have agreed to eliminate their nukes.

They did! They sold it to terrorist.

88 posted on 09/22/2007 8:19:58 PM PDT by txroadkill ( http://iraqstar.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke

“What a joke of a President.”

That’s just not fair.


111 posted on 09/22/2007 8:46:02 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (When O'Reilly comes out from under his desk, tell him to give me a call. Hunter/Thompson in 08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke; jveritas
I like to think Bush is smarter than most of his opposition, and even his detractors amongst his philosophical allies even here on FR. He's had the Dems largely on the ropes where policy initiatives are concerned for most of this year. Dems are pedaling in place and acting like they are going to be facing Bush in the 2008 election. Totally delusional.

Perhaps he's focusing everyone's attention on Iran only for the ultimate purpose of taking out Syria and Iran together. Imagine what it looks like for Dems who went to Syria to suck up to Assad if Bush invades and takes out Syria and discovers Saddam's WMDs?

Maybe the Israelis just took out the obstacle ahead of US invasion.

What sort of a political coup do you think that would be? Exposing the Iran-Syria-North Korea axis, destroying it, and with it a main military armament cash-paying customer for North Korea? Outcome: a Middle East under US and allied influence stretching from Lebanon through Sryia, Iraq, Iran, all the way to Afghanistan.

Is the successful invasion of Syria what it will take for the largely pro-Western Iranians to rise up against the mullahs, and take them down themselves perhaps?

I suspect that the bombimg of Syria by the Israelis on September 6 is probably more significant for what the press doesn't know about than what it thinks it does.

A lot of Bush's detractors might be eating some humble pie before this is all over. As a foreign policy victory it would rank up there with Reagan's castration of the Soviet Union, and would reverse foreign policy blunders of Democrats stretching back more than 50 years.

113 posted on 09/22/2007 8:46:29 PM PDT by My2SonsAreMarines (They are both Eagle Scouts too -- and I'm proud of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke

I have a theory...I think that as part of the agreement with North Korwea recently discussed in the press in vague terms, that the North Koreans agreed to cough up intellignece about the nuclear material it suppl;ied to Syria and to Iran, and this raid was a result of conformation of the location of the material from Korean sources.

Note that when Korea stated that they were going to be off of the terrorism list after the talks, the US responded by saying “not so fast, Charley.” in diplo speak, of course. I think it was to see whether the intelligence would pan out.

This may lead to part of the inelligence proof that we will obviously need to convince the public that the US must use military force in Iran to stop them from using the nuclear materials. The proof must be solid to support that action in the current political environment.

At this time, thjere are a series of atrticles coming out disclosing various kinds of secret plans, and I believe this is part of the psy-ops preparatory to a strike early next year.

All speculation on my part...


133 posted on 09/22/2007 9:31:10 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke

“And yet Bush claims that the DPRK have agreed to eliminate their nukes. What a joke of a President.”

Well, KB, would we be better with Her Thighness? After all, she couldn’t remember any details about the Rose billing records, FBI files, didn’t know anything about Bubba’s extracurricular activities and didn’t believe any of that. She was hoodwinked, apparently, by the Chinese money connections in the ‘90’s, then again with Norman Hsu. Never heard of George Soros. And who is William Danielczyk, anyway?

Who’s a joke? You are.


136 posted on 09/22/2007 9:41:31 PM PDT by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke

Never forget that disinformation is our ally as well.


188 posted on 09/23/2007 3:54:22 AM PDT by LFOD (IRAQ - Back in Dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke
...And yet Bush claims that the DPRK have agreed to eliminate their nukes. What a joke of a President."

LOL, what the HELL are you saying here? Where is the conflict in the president relaying what the DPRK has said and the fact that what they said turns out to be a lie? Are actually claiming the president is responsible for the lies of the DPRK?

Send me some of whatever you smokin'', dude.

200 posted on 09/23/2007 5:18:06 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke

Eliminate... a new synonym for distributed inventory


213 posted on 09/23/2007 5:46:15 AM PDT by pointsal (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke

They HAVE eliminated their nukes - they sold ‘em off to Syria (and Iran?).


298 posted on 09/26/2007 8:14:17 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke
Bush claims that the DPRK have agreed to eliminate their nukes.

They did, they gave them to the Hizbullah.

299 posted on 09/27/2007 7:34:36 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson