Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Officer who berated driver loses job in St. George
STLtoday.com ^ | 09/21/2007 | Kim Bell and Greg Jonsson

Posted on 09/22/2007 8:03:54 AM PDT by beltfed308

ST. GEORGE — A police officer who was recorded berating a motorist earlier this month has lost his job.

The board of aldermen voted 5-0, with one member absent, to fire Sgt. James Kuehnlein on Monday. The vote was cast in a session closed to the public and wasn't announced until Wednesday, when a notice was posted at the City Hall of this tiny south St. Louis County community.

In a video that got wide viewership on the Internet, Kuehnlein taunts and threatens motorist Brett Darrow, 20, sometimes shouting and using profanity, after questioning him in a commuter lot near Interstate 55. Darrow posted the footage of the Sept. 7 incident on the web.

(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: badcopnodonut; banglist; beserkcop; brettdarrow; donutwatch; fired; leo; police; stgeorge; wiggum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 741-752 next last
To: JosephW

Just to clarify, I was in one for the first 6 houses on Mullally Dr, where I could look down and see the lot.

That cop was just full of it.

He forgot that we hire police to keep us safe, not to have masters that will intimidate us.


201 posted on 09/22/2007 9:22:34 PM PDT by JosephW (Mohammad Lied, People die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Copernicus

Wow! Your story just dovetails from Brett’s.

I’d personally request the D.A. to file charges against the officer if I was you.

I don’t know you, but I’m assuming your a pretty decent size guy, but you teach a lot of people and many of them are probably smaller women. Can you imagine if he did that to one of them, maybe even pushing hard enough to break some teeth on the concrete wall.

Take some action to keep this from happening again. The letter from Internal Affairs was laughable. The officer will receive a reprimand that will be inserted into his file. Yeah, that’s really going to hurt him (Brett’s cop had done worse and it was expunged). At a minimum he should also receive some serious time off without pay or be fired. This would definitely keep other holders from being harrassed in the future.


202 posted on 09/22/2007 9:51:50 PM PDT by JosephW (Mohammad Lied, People die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: JosephW

“I find it hard to believe that the crime rate is that high in that area”

That is something else I wanted to say as well. This is in quiet South St. Louis County. This is not in a high crime rate area at all. I have no doubt the talk about the thefts in that area was just another lie like all the others that came out of Sgt. James Kuehnlein’s mouth.


203 posted on 09/22/2007 11:22:05 PM PDT by Brett Darrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Brett Darrow

Kudos, Brett. Despite some of the hand wringers here, you did good work.

In the early ‘90s, I drove a Suzuki Samurai. The Samurai was once known as a “poor man’s Jeep” or more vulgarly, a “n*****s Jeep”. It was a cop magnet. I got stopped in that vehicle at least once a month. Sometimes my “music was too loud” or my “tail light was too dim” and once because I was in a well-to-do neighborhood trying to find an alternative route around a closed bridge. I even had one cop pull me over and literally SCREAM at me because I was doing 61 in a 55... yet he issued no ticket. I wish that the technology existed back then... I would have surely employed a camera to catch some of these evening cowboys behaving badly.

Keep up the good work.

APf


204 posted on 09/23/2007 12:02:29 AM PDT by APFel (Regnum Nostrum Crescit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: All

Also, I wanted to post about the officer’s patrol car video.

When I first went to see the chief and file a formal complaint on Tuesday the 11th, the chief said he didn’t think the system was turned on for my stop. He told me the units installed were the ‘Prosecutor 2000’. He told me they turn on by the officer pressing the button on his body mic, a button in the car, or when any or the rotating lights come on (when the slide bar is pushed on the Code 3 control box). I told him it would have recorded then since you can see the lights come on when he comes up behind me. He tried telling me it might have only been the tape down lights (big bright white lights on lightbar that DON’T flash). I told him that those were on, but you can clearly see in my mirror, the overhead flashing lights were on.

He finally told me their was no tape. He didn’t know what happened to it and said the officer probably got rid of it. They have 7 tapes (one for each day) and they just rotate them unless one is needed for court or a complaint.

The next day I met with him again. He had all of a sudden come up with a tape that was supposedly the “missing” tape, but it had no footage from anything that happened that night. It had stuff on there from weeks ago. It was clear they just stuck a tape in it’s spot. This conveniently happened after the officer got an attorney. I’m sure he told them that if an officer destroys evidence, it’s a federal felony.

The chief has even publicly gone back and forth about if there is a tape from THAT night, or if it just didn’t record.

They know if that tape came out though, the officer would be in jail. He had me pinned up against my car and while yelling at me, spit was flying all over my face.

I think it’s funny when people say I baited the officer. He was the one baiting me to push/hit him so he could beat me up. He was the one looking to start something that night.


205 posted on 09/23/2007 12:36:53 AM PDT by Brett Darrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: APFel

That is something I have been getting a lot of emails about. People with similar stories that had no chance in getting anything done about it since it was their word vs. the cops.


206 posted on 09/23/2007 12:38:31 AM PDT by Brett Darrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Brett Darrow

Excellent work Brett. I find it funny that the same people who have smeared your name here for videotaping this cop, most likely think that NBC’s “To Catch a Predator” show is the best thing since sliced bread. Be very, very careful now, as I’m sure you’re now Target #1 where you live. Keep up the good work and sue their a$$es off and use the money to go to law school. Have you called the field office for the FBI yet??? There’s one in St. Louis isn’t there??? Ask them about “Color of Law” violations.


207 posted on 09/23/2007 2:45:15 AM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Brett Darrow

Interesting. Scary situation. He was looking for a fight methinks.

Would love to see their tapes, but we all know that will never happen.

good job.


208 posted on 09/23/2007 2:57:18 AM PDT by commonguymd (Move it to the right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: snarkybob
"How do you know the kid didn’t have a good reason?"

Because he never gave one?

"So the only problem you have with this is that the cop got caught?"

Who said I have a problem? The cop got caught. He needs to be punished.

209 posted on 09/23/2007 5:01:37 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: tenthirteen
"I would be interested in seeing where this rogue street reporter is in five years. Real interested."

If he stays in St. Louis and continues what he's doing?

Well, according to most of the posters on this board, he'll receive a "Citizen of the Year" award from the St. Louis Police Department for his assistance in weeding out the unfit among them. The cops will personaly present him with the "Keys to the City" and have a parade in his honor for being the one responible for their fellow police officers being disgraced and fired.

210 posted on 09/23/2007 5:10:54 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Starwolf

Yup.


211 posted on 09/23/2007 5:12:58 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander
"You realize this ex-cop deliberately destroyed his dashcam video tape from this incident, and just this incident, and then claimed that his dashcam was malfunctioning?"

I'm not surprised. Add it to his list of screw-ups.

"... and if more evidence presents itself of a long term pattern of abuse order color of authority ..."

I nominate this 20-year-old kid as the one to uncover it. He knows the law, the U.S. Constitution, he's already got the police scanner and the car cameras hooked up to a secure recorder, and, obviously, the time to drive around aimlessly at 2am on the lookout for these rogue cops.

I bet he'll even get a special reward from the St. Louis Police Department for his efforts.

212 posted on 09/23/2007 5:18:55 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

I disagree. Had the cop been fired on a he said/she said basis and nothing else, you would be correct. This officer acted like a complete a$$h@le, and it was obvious to everyone with 20/200 vision or better.
A good officer will not let himself get baited, will not engage in debates in the street, and will get his job done effectively in a professional manner.
This case should have no negative impact on any good officers, and may give pause to the bad ones, though I doubt that.


213 posted on 09/23/2007 5:22:13 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: thefactor

Bingo. That should have been the lead paragraph in the article.


214 posted on 09/23/2007 5:22:49 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
"Heck, according to you cops are so undisciplined the only response one can expect is for them to take actions that lead to their termination."

So if I put a hidden camera on every St. Louis cop for 30 days, there wouldn't be anything on it that could get them disciplined or fired. According to you.

Gosh, it must be pleasant living in your childish fantasy world.

215 posted on 09/23/2007 5:31:50 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

Coming from one as childish and naive as you, I’ll just ignore that.


216 posted on 09/23/2007 5:33:44 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

My sentiments exactly.


217 posted on 09/23/2007 5:36:00 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
"You got to love the irony."

In a sense. It was a reverse sting.

But it was driven by a personal desire (Revenge? YouTube exposure? Ego trip? Anti-authority expression?) rather than a public service.

It would be similar to a cop targeting an individual, personally, for some legal infraction (ie., waiting outside a bar then ticketing him for DUI). Yes, we can all agree that the guy was wrong for drinking and driving and that he deserved the ticket, but ....

218 posted on 09/23/2007 5:47:23 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: webstersII
"So, let’s get this straight: you are saying it’s okay for LEOs to charge people with offenses that they did not commit just because that person gives them an attitude?"

Was the kid charged? I didn't realize that.

To answer your question, no, it's definitely not okay for LEOs to charge people with offenses that they did not commit -- for any reason.

219 posted on 09/23/2007 5:50:09 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Dinsdale
"You make it sound like being setup is an excuse."

An excuse? Not at all.

What this kid did is not much different than a cop staking out a bar and pulling over drivers who have just left (with a valid reason, of course) and doing a Breathalyzer.

They deserve their DUI, yes?

220 posted on 09/23/2007 6:02:03 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 741-752 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson