Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Major Cable and Satellite Operators Face Class Antitrust Suit
Multichannel News ^ | 9/21/2007 | Kent Gibbons and Ted Hearn

Posted on 09/22/2007 3:48:45 AM PDT by Las Vegas Dave

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: TomGuy

Ever thought of reading a book?


41 posted on 09/22/2007 10:42:28 AM PDT by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I concur (Maybe Joseph Farrah-and some big donors) want to start one up?


42 posted on 09/22/2007 10:43:37 AM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
Ever thought of reading a book?

Maybe you are just confused.

This is a thread about cable/satellite television and the proposed ala carte issue.
43 posted on 09/22/2007 10:54:29 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave
cable and satellite TV firms of colluding to only offer prepackaged tiers of bundled programs and refusing to sell programming a la carte

This is the second bundling related post I've seen here in the last few weeks. Mathematically minded freepers might find the curiously timely Ponder This problem interesting. I found the solution unexpectedly thought provoking.

44 posted on 09/22/2007 11:05:10 AM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
I would like an ala Carte option. That would certainly be the end of Gore TV (Current TV).

I have no satellite or cable, and won't have until they offer ala Carte at reasonable prices.

45 posted on 09/22/2007 11:09:21 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Zimbabwe, leftist success story, the envy of Venezuela)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

Or even the ability to own your own phone. That and there would still be a more than a few rotary dial phones left around.


46 posted on 09/22/2007 11:27:25 AM PDT by Comstock1 (If it's a miracle, Colour Sergeant, it's a short chamber Boxer Henry point 45 caliber miracle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

Total waste of time. The plaintiffs should just use the TVs and STBs to block channels, create preferred scan lists of favorite channels (to avoid the 60 channels of junk), and use DVRs to capture only the shows they want to watch. It will cost a fortune for the companies to build and operate the billing system to completely unbundle all channels — and guess who will pay for that in the end, anyway?


47 posted on 09/22/2007 12:20:42 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: holden

I do not support the current monopoly, but unless it is broken up by law, then it isn’t going away. Trying to institute a pay per channel system IN THE CURRENT SYSTEM will most definitely mean higher prices for less channels.

Every single time that Congress has passed a law to change something in the cable industry has always resulted in higher prices. This will be more of the same.


48 posted on 09/22/2007 2:10:33 PM PDT by packrat35 (PIMP my Senate. They're all a bunch of whores anyway!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ADemocratNoMore; advertising guy; AJMaXx; Alice in Wonderland; american colleen; arbooz; auboy; ...

Pinging the HDTV list - Latest DIRECTV news.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Why Is DIRECTV Quiet About HDTV?
Subscribers are demanding answers on the upcoming high-def expansion.
By Swanni

Washington, D.C. (September 21, 2007) — DIRECTV this week missed an internal deadline for launching its much-anticipated High-Definition channel expansion, according to several sources.

The satcaster has been tight-lipped on the reason why. (Sources say it’s a minor but persistent issue with integrating customer accounts with the new channel lineup.) There has been no press release from DIRECTV stating an exact launch date or an explanation of what’s going on.

The lack of response from DIRECTV headquarters is stirring anxieties and causing speculation and rumors about the real cause of the delay.

This has led countless DIRECTV subscribers to call the satcaster’s Customer Service department with complaints and/or simple inquiries.

Additionally, many of those customers have filled Internet message boards with laments about why DIRECT couldn’t simply issue a statement explaining what’s going on.

The frustration is understandable. DIRECTV is planning to offer an unprecedented number of high-def channels (100 HD channels by year’s end; 70 HD channels in October, its web site now says) and people are getting anxious to see them.

But in defense of DIRECTV, the satcaster is in a tough position. Until it knows exactly when everything is ready for the first wave of new HD channels, it can’t issue a launch date. It will look foolish if the date can not be met.

Plus, any official confirmation of “technical difficulties” will just stir more rumors and speculation.

So, for now, DIRECTV has little choice but to wait for the problem to be resolved. And, unfortunately, so do its customers.


49 posted on 09/22/2007 4:03:24 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." Hillary Clinton, June 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

MY theory—somebody doesn’t like paying to receive the gay channel. I could exclude it, but don’t like having it part of the package I pay for.


50 posted on 09/22/2007 8:53:44 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Las Vegas Dave

National Geographic is currently testing on channel 9300 and Discovery is testing on 9301. Don’t know how long they’ll be up but it is a start.


51 posted on 09/22/2007 10:10:46 PM PDT by WackySam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: Las Vegas Dave

I’ll be converting to HD (Pioneer Elite Pro 150FD) next month and I plan to stay with Dish Network. Not that it’s that great, but the alternatives (DirecTV and Comcast) are worse. Supposedly AT&T U-verse is coming to my area. Anybody here have experience with that system?


54 posted on 09/23/2007 7:18:38 AM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Comcast does not offer ESPNU at all.


55 posted on 09/24/2007 8:03:57 AM PDT by KeyesPlease
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: HChampagne
I would like to be able to go into my local Winn Dixie and not have to put up with the hundreds of items that I do not use and never will buy. It would lower the prices on those items that I do purchase. I think that I will sue.

What would you say to a store that required you to buy deodorant, shampoo, a loaf of bread, and feminine napkins, anytime you wanted just a tube of toothpaste.

56 posted on 09/26/2007 7:14:41 AM PDT by toast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson