“Mitt Romney is not unique at all.” “BS!”
Not BS, Truth. I gave multiple examples, not Reagan, others.
Like GHW Bush. This is about the double-standard people apply to Romney. Add Sam Brownback and Fred Thompson to the list of evolvers based on early comments. But no, only Romney’s 1994 statements count as a ‘lifelong prochioce’ view, the pro-choice statements of others should be ignored.... hmmmm.
Can you read?
Unless what Reagan Man has posted concerning Romney being Pro Roe vs. Wade until 2005 there is no comparison between him and Thompson. You have one statement in 1994 from Thompson and a ton of statements AND ACTIONs on the part of Romney up until 2005.
Can you prove by Romney’s record that Reagan Man is incorrect about Romney being Pro-choice or at least pro Roe vs. Wade until 2005?
Do you not see the difference or do you just choose to ignore the difference because Mitt is your man?