>>>>>There I was telling Petronski that I understood his point. I neither agreed with it, nor disagreed with it.Okay, got it. ;)You didn't have to. Couch it anyway you like. Your inference is crystal clear.
Okay, got it. = I don't agree.
And your narrative since that reply is also crystal clear.
No, my point was not about what Romney said about Reagan at all. It was that if Romney had signed like legislation in 1968 that there would be a double standard with regard to what would be said of Romney vs. Reagan today.
The damage is done. Trying to back off now just makes you look foolish.