Easy for you to say. ...I believe that was the essence of what I said.
... Frankly, this is another attempt to revise the historic record as it relates to Reagan, in an effort to give Romney a pass on his 30+ year pro-abortion record.I disagree. I'm not revising anything and I'm aware of Romney's record.
I'd be willing to post more facts, ...I have read them many times, plus I have done my own research.
... but something tells me you're not interested in the truth.I'm comfortable with the truth as it stands.
I didn't see it that way. You're remarks were nuanced rhetoric. ;^)
>>>>>>I'm not revising anything and I'm aware of Romney's record.
Really. You gave your opinion and agreed with Romney that Reagan was adamantly pro-choice. When there is no evidence to support such an assertion. Obviously you view Romney`s record through the prism of anti-conservative politics. If you didn't you would have dropped the "Romney is like Reagan" nonsense by now.
>>>>>I have read them many times, plus I have done my own research. I'm comfortable with the truth as it stands.
You're an historic revisionist with no respect for the truth. If you did your own research, you wouldn't be backing Mitt Boy. His shifts on abortion, gays and guns, along with his penchant for nationalized health care make him a very poor candidate for conservatives to support.