This is in the context of a pre-Roe v. Wade world, nevertheless, I’d say that if Reagan had doubts about abuses then he should have not signed the legislation. I’m not being critical of Reagan, governors and presidents have to make tough decisions everyday and it’s not possible to get them all right. You just hope that they get the big ones right; often times it’s many, many years later before you know if it was right.
Easy for you to say. One sentence or one paragraph doesn't change the factual content. Frankly, this is another attempt to revise the historic record as it relates to Reagan, in an effort to give Romney a pass on his 30+ year pro-abortion record. Won't work.
I'd be willing to post more facts, but something tells me you're not interested in the truth.