Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Survey USA Presidential Matchup Polls in KS,KY, OH, and AL
Survey USA ^ | Sept 20, 2007 | Survey USA

Posted on 09/21/2007 12:33:50 PM PDT by Kuksool

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: chimera

Wasn’t Ohio in a similar spot in 1982? The recession disillusioned a lot of Ohioans on Reaganonmics, and the state re-elected its Democratic governor and senator easily, and Democrats generally ran very strong overall statewide. John Glenn was even beating Reagan in some polls. Then 1984 came along, and Reagan rolled up 59% of the vote.

Granted, this is not 1984 by any means, but it shows that a strong Democratic trend in Ohio did not produce a like result in the presidential race in the next cycle.


21 posted on 09/21/2007 8:35:27 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Groundchuck Hagel and Lindsey Grahamcracker are undesirable menu items in 2008. Make new choices!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: toldyou

That calculator is the biggest load of Barbra Streisand I have ever seen. Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich.


22 posted on 09/22/2007 1:36:23 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

Oh, Rose... it is September 2007. The election is November 2008. There is still a whole lot of game left to be played.


23 posted on 09/22/2007 2:05:56 AM PDT by carton253 (And if that time does come, then draw your swords and throw away the scabbards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

“That calculator is the biggest load of Barbra Streisand I have ever seen. Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich.”

Oops...I picked Fred Thompson, and didn’t even look at any others!


24 posted on 09/22/2007 5:10:49 AM PDT by toldyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Galactic Overlord-In-Chief
That is a good example of what may have to happen in '08 to win the state. In '82, the overhang was a lingering national recession. That resulted in an anti-Reagan tide. In '06, the overhang was Iraq. 'Pubs in OH got swept out as a result of a protest vote against both Bush/Iraq and the state GOP, which was rocked by scandal and had controlled the state for four consensecutive election cycles.

In '84, the recession had pretty much ended and people were feeling better about the economy. The "overhang" had receded somewhat. We're going to need something like that with Iraq in '08 to take the edge off a potential repudiation of Bush/Iraq vote in '08.

Another factor in '84 was the caliber of competition. People we just not that inclined to dump Reagan in favor of Mondale. Reagan was a personally popular incumbent going up against a candidate who was perceived as a holdover from a miserably failed Administration. 2008 will be a race for a completely open seat. Our candidate is going to have to present a positive message, because they won't have an incumbency to fall back on. And even if they did, they wouldn't want to, if it is that of the current Administration.

25 posted on 09/22/2007 6:57:50 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson