Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

I don’t want to be obnoxious here, but I think this is another example of the white population finding any excuse to avoid conflict and using the nooses (none of which were used for anything but symbolism) is a way to avoid defending the beatdown of this kid.

Now what it is that Whites are avoiding, I just don’t know.
A rebellion? A boycott? Getting peeled off from the herd and being made an example of?

I just don’t get it.

6 kids beat a white kid unconscious. This is thuggish—nooses or no nooses. Even if the kid had a swastika tattooed on his forehead, it doesn’t excuse the violence. Even if he used the N-word all day long, you can’t attack people like that. Or, that’s my understanding of things.


20 posted on 09/20/2007 11:59:06 PM PDT by kbingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: kbingham

Frankly, who gives a rip about the nooses?

It’s a consciencious choice to take offense at something. Sometimes it’s easier to make than others, and this would appear to be such a case. But if you can’t control yourself over seeing an image you don’t like, you deserve no sympathy whatsoever.

These thugs are no worse than the Muslim fools who burnt down Europe over some cartoons. It’s the exact same thing.

I can’t believe there are people on this site defending this around the noose argument.


34 posted on 09/21/2007 2:21:33 AM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson