Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hal1950; Palladin
"We know for a fact that cameras and film were confiscated from many people on Long Island who took pictures of the explosion." ***** What alleged "fact" do you have for that statement.

There was a cocktail party on Long Island, I think the Hamptons but it was somewhere on the South Fork on the water. At that party someone took a photograph of it. There were lots of witnesses and at least one picture. The FBI came and took the pictures and the negatives. That is one incident that I know of.

163 posted on 09/21/2007 5:38:20 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: ladyjane

I remember that - the people were on the Today show with the photo - then later it was reported that the photo was confiscated by the FBI. The photo clearly showed something that looked like a missile heading toward the plane.


177 posted on 09/21/2007 6:19:41 AM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: ladyjane

There were many more, reported in the first hours after the explosion. I was glued to the TV and heard the many eyewitness reports early on. And also all the people complaining on TV that their film and cameras were taken by the FBI.

Because the “incident” affected so many people in my town, I became a TWA 800 news junkie and read every thing I could find about it. Unfortunately, I wasn’t online yet at that time.

As happens in many such “incidents”, the first reports ...the ones that contradicted the Clinton party line...were censored and never shown again.


222 posted on 09/21/2007 5:30:27 PM PDT by Palladin (Satan to Fidel: "Let me light your cigar.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: ladyjane
Your assertion is not accurate. The following was the response to an earlier similar contention:

THE LINDA KABOT PHOTO
The photo taken by Kabot depicts a bearing of north/northeast. TWA Flight 800 was south/southwest almost directly behind her.
Photograph analyzed by CIA National Imagery and Mapping Administration (NIMA) advised that
1. THERE IS OBJECT IN PHOTO
2. OBJECT IS NOT A MISSILE

3. OBJECT APPEARS TO BE AN AIRCRAFT
Not possible to ID aircraft because:
Not possible to determine distance of object from camera.
Exact time of photo unknown. (time frame only is known)
Insufficient detail in photo to determine type of aircraft.
4. OBJECT IS NOT A DRONE
No drone exercises conducted near Long Island July 17, 1996
http://judiciary.senate.gov/oldsite/51099lsa.htm

228 posted on 09/21/2007 7:26:15 PM PDT by Hal1950
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson