Posted on 09/20/2007 7:08:04 PM PDT by SandRat
They only keep this pompous Democrat ass on MSNBC to pander to the political left, which is their only audience at the present time.
I can't see how anyone could conclude otherwise.
Anti-war nuts are deranged, pure and simple.
who’s Chris Matthews?
Laura please set up a title fight with Olberman-I wanna see that pompous ass punch drunk
Laura’s a grown up and doesn’t normally get to bothered by anything these lefty losers throw at her !!!
fairly factless on both sides I’d say. Actually, fairly factless on one side ade and unfairly factless on the other.
Unfortunately here in Kuwait... Hardball is played on AFN at Noon! and I don’t want to have a Course of agita with my Lunch! Thanks for the Pla by Play!
A win, but then, she is fighting below her mental weight class. By about 3 classes.
Hooray Laura! “Power to the People” BUMP!
Not so! They keep him on board to insure their rating stay in the sewer where they’ve been since, well, day one.
Chris Matthews always loses, but always gives himself the last word to make the audience (who isn’t REALLY listening) think he won.
They should do one of those celebrity boxing things, I bet she'd kick his fat little ass all over the ring.
Chris is only one of the Geobelites of the Democrap Party, along with Mr. Potato Head from Meet the Depressed!
whos Chris Matthews
Me thinks... this Chris Matthews is harboring OBL in his basement. I also think moveon.org is supplying nutrition and supplements to OBL and sending them via carrier service though the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ of dollers that Soros has sent them...............................
I DISPISE MSM and LIBS! ALL LIBS.
I think he used to be a security guard somewhere on the Mall in DC, and happened to bump into a news job about the time MSNBC was emerging. About the same insightful talent is reflected (as in the Reflecting Pool).
IMHO, this transcript is what is wrong with American politics.
I don’t observe one complete sentence, nor do I observe one argument more than 2-3 steps long over an entire page of transcript.
If people who live in a very secure nation, with secure salaries, and plenty of food, family and shelter are unable to garner enough wherewithal to discuss simple policy issues, let alone complicated national and international issues of conflicting interests, how can one advocate this our status quo in government, reporting, and analysis?
IMHO, we have no moral imperative to influence the volition of foreign nations when our political capacities are so inept locally from township to national arenas. I’ve observed more political swaggering throughout every element of power based upon corrupt systems more than any one simple ability to mange any small problem at even a local level.
It is as if we have become a nation of the corrupt, managing things as though we perceive what is right in our own eyes, as we corruptly manage the corrupt.
I hardly remember this show is even on the air anymore. What an absolute joke.
She's fiesty, but did not refute Matthews points effectively.
What points did Matthews even have?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.