Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Perhaps one of our windmill-tilting legal groups can get this suit working its way through the courts. If it gets to the Supremes, guess how many of them are Bush/Reagan appointees? Fun fun!

And I wonder what they would rule if Hillary divorced Bill. Would it change the merits of the case?

Seriously, the worst this challenge would do is cost the Clintons a lot in legal defense and serve as a distraction to their campaign. Heck, I'd be glad to throw in the first $100 to get this lawsuit rolling.

Let the word go out "NO third term for Clinton!"

1 posted on 09/20/2007 6:51:12 PM PDT by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tall_Texan

No, she can’t.

I’ve got an idea, though. Vote for the guy who’s most likely to defeat her.


2 posted on 09/20/2007 6:52:46 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tall_Texan

He name is Clinton, she is female, a democrat, a feminist, a Senator, a socialist, a “done wrong” wife … ain’t a chance in Hades a lawsuit would mean anything.


3 posted on 09/20/2007 6:57:50 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tall_Texan

Unfortunately in this case, being First Lady for two terms is not a constitutional bar to running for President.

We’ll just have to win.


4 posted on 09/20/2007 6:59:37 PM PDT by RichInOC (Hillary Rodham Clinton is a lying slag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tall_Texan
Though slick is an impediment in some ways to her, I doubt if he would be if she was elected. I'm not so sure if she can't be elected if she's in prison following conviction of fraud involving campaign funds.

I wonder how hard it would be to run the executive branch from a jail cell? SNL, get yer thinking hats on.

6 posted on 09/20/2007 7:08:03 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

If one crazy old bat in Texas didn’t sue to get prayer thrown out of school, who would have ever thought it would be possible to win that in court? Back in the 1960s?


7 posted on 09/20/2007 7:12:25 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (No Third Term For Bill Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tall_Texan

I’m finding it hard to believe you call yourself a Tall Texan. To be so scared of Hillary Clinton winning the presidency that you would propose such a desperate idea—one that I would think only a Democrat could come up with—is ridiculous. Grow a pair!


11 posted on 09/20/2007 7:50:07 PM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tall_Texan
I wouldn’t call this the best strategy. A successful strategy should be about ideas.

I also think there would be a better chance of getting President Bush a third term based on all the dems claiming he was never elected for his first term.

13 posted on 09/20/2007 8:20:29 PM PDT by mnehring (Thompson/Hunter 08 -- Fred08.com - The adults have joined the race.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tall_Texan

Sons are more familiarly related than spouses. This did not stop John Quincy Adams from being President. Let this be your precedent.


16 posted on 09/20/2007 8:33:00 PM PDT by Socratic (“Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow; it empties today of its strength.” - Corrie Ten Boom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson