[Captain Kirk]

may not believe that 9/11 was a government conspiracy, but he was certainly willing to pander to those that do... at least until he was caught doing it. That in itself disqualifies him as presidential material.

Well since you're into McCarthyite litmus tests....a much stronger case can be made that a presidential candidate should be "disqualified" for "pandering" to those who would violate the Constitution by supporting an undeclared, preemptive, Wilsonian war. Then again, since you like litmus tests so much, why not "disqualify" a candidate who openly lobbies to restore a murdering thug named Aristide to power? Let me guess, you think that is "different?"

[PsyOp]

“Well since you’re into McCarthyite litmus tests....”

Might I suggest that you refrain from using psychadelic drugs before posting? It helps prevent the kind of rambling incoherency you subjected me to with this post.