Perhaps because his campaign is a welcome break from the status-quo? Are you saying that the skinheads or the anti-war kooks are NOT entitled to vote? That they're vote is somehow not worthy because of their foul agenda? You don't know WHO these people are, and no, I'm not excusing them, but really, how do you know at first glace who they are if they went to the voting booth in the end? Are you really blaming Paul just because he has a straight-forward message that will unfortunately attract some oddballs?
And you seem to have a very cavalier attitude about it.
Because it's nothing. Until Ron Paul's OFFICIAL campaign. Here, let me repeat that: OFFICIAL campaign is in coordination, collusion, or is being funded by neo-Nazis anarchists or left-wing anti-war kooks, then that's the day I will stop supporting Dr. Paul.
They are kooks, spammers and trolls.
The question remains then: why are these “neo-Nazis anarchists” and “left-wing anti-war kooks” so fanatic in their support of Paul?
Do you really believe it’s because of his “straight-forward message”? Wouldn’t a more logical reason be that his anti-Israel record and friendship with 9/11 “truther” King Alex Jones is really why these kooks are supporting him?
Plus, Paul voted against Bush in 2000 and 2004 and ran against his father in 1988. He is a RINO.