To: mnehrling; dragnet2; Petronski
dragnet2 is using
diversionary tactics.
It is usually seen in one of the last stages of the Paulistinian breakdown.
321 posted on
09/21/2007 6:59:42 AM PDT by
lormand
(Ron Paul 08' - Magnet for America's kookiest nutballs)
To: lormand
What he was doing was an elementary school level debate tactic. You ask several questions in which you know the poster will agree and you are leading that person to a specific point you want. All of these small questions result in something like Wouldn't you agree then that XX is right about XX.
It's an old tactic, you cause the person to make several agreeing statements on simple items to a point where if you don't agree with their final conclusion you are in a corner and have to go back several levels in order to restate something. You've then lost credibility.
324 posted on
09/21/2007 7:03:24 AM PDT by
mnehring
(Thompson/Hunter 08 -- Fred08.com - The adults have joined the race.)
To: lormand
dragnet2 is using diversionary tactics. Haha. Too funny!
In #176 I posted this diversionary tactical question: Tell me, why does our current leadership, aid and abet, and actually encourage this massive violent invasion of our country?
Care to take a shot at this tricky, diversionary tactical question?
:o
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson