For someone who was so clever as he tap-danced around giving a easy 'yes' or 'no' to a direct question, you suddenly became mentally dense about interpreting what is obvious to even the most casual reader.
Your agenda is to give Big Government the power to destroy one of the most important of the three legs of individual freedom/capitalism, the right to own and control private property.
That may not be clear enough, so let me know?
By way of proof of that agenda you will need to excercise some mental horsepower, begin to educate youself about private property, the founding father opinion of the importance of same. You may be an unwitting participant.
You need to get a grip and realize that electrical power lines are vital
And schools aren't? Many will argue that schools are far more important than mere electrical power lines.
You need to get a grip and realize that electrical power lines are vital
So are city offices and repair shops. Try arguing otherwise with the bureaucrats. OH WAIT! It DOESN'T MATTER! They can just TAKE the property!
You need to get a grip and realize that electrical power lines are vital
And revenue isn't? Come on! How else will we have government officials who can exercise the precious eminent domain?
You sir, need to brush up a tad on the Constitution, specifically the Bill of rights. It limits the government in taking property, and requires a fair payment.
My agenda is to have a limited government, not no government. It is vital that power lines are ran.
You may be interested to learn that in cases where the government goes too far, and it is possible and most likely true, it does not follow that the government always goes too far.
Thinking that I am for big government is about as foolish as one can be, you should send your agenda theory packing. And calling for Jim to ban me is really pathetic.