[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Ron Paul is the only GOP candidate that would retreat and surrender to Al Qaeda in Iraq.

It'll be the year 2050 and you guys will still be complaining about the need to "stay the course." While I have always disagreed with Paul on an immediate withdrawal, I sure in the heck don't want any permanent bases or long-term commitment either in the Middle East.

None of the Democrats though are in favor of strict border security or a strong national defense. Paul would at least secure the country, and warn the ragheads if they ever think about attacking us again it'll be their asses. Tell me, if the race boiled down to Paul or a Dem you wouldn't boogie to the voting booth for Paul just because a portion of his foreign policy sucks.

[jrooney]

"Tell me, if the race boiled down to Paul or a Dem you wouldn't boogie to the voting booth for Paul just because a portion of his foreign policy sucks."

It is a mute point because Paul will not even come close to being the GOP candidate. My cat stands a better chance at being elected POTUS because he is smarter, tougher, better looking and more of a statesman.

[pianomikey]

Sure, I’d be happy to vote for Ron Paul because of the 90% that’s good. But I ain’t supporting him in the primaries, because he ain’t right on the war. How would “Turn tail and run” and “pull out all our bases from the Middle East” leave the terrorists quivering with fear??

[rineaux]

It’ll be the year 2050 and you guys will still be complaining about the need to “stay the course.”

Great news is the surge will be working.

Back in the former United States, english will be a second language.

Side question? Who threw bombs that 22, 23 and 24 had to be yanked?