Skip to comments.
Landis May Forfeit Tour de France Win
AP - SFGate ^
| 9/20/07
| Eddie Pells
Posted on 09/20/2007 11:03:43 AM PDT by SF Republican
Floyd Landis lost his expensive and explosive doping case Thursday when the arbitrators upheld the results of a test that showed the 2006 Tour de France champion used synthetic testosterone to fuel his spectacular comeback victory, The Associated Press has learned.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: landis
To: SF Republican
2
posted on
09/20/2007 11:05:58 AM PDT
by
Vision
("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
To: SF Republican
“Not only did we embarrass Marky Mark - we let down the Funky Bunch!”
3
posted on
09/20/2007 11:06:15 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that so many self-proclaimed "Constitutionalists" know so little about the Constitution?)
To: SF Republican
Nothing in this story ever made sense, I’m glad it’s over I guess.
4
posted on
09/20/2007 11:06:58 AM PDT
by
Vision
("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: SF Republican
As a former amateur cyclist, I could never understand why a cyclist would use steroids - a drug mostly used for adding mass. During this whole case the reason for steroids was never explained. Recently, however, I learned that steroids are good for recovery after intense physical efforts.
That impossible 30 minute gap he made up sure is easier to believe if steroids are involved.
I give up on this guy and all other cheaters - serve your 2 years, clean up, and try doing it right next time - Cheater.
6
posted on
09/20/2007 11:12:43 AM PDT
by
stratboy
To: SF Republican
From the article:
The majority repeatedly wrote that any mistakes made at the lab were not enough to dismiss the positive test, but also sent a warning. "If such practises continue, it may well be that in the future, an error like this could result in the dismissal" of a positive finding by the lab.
In other words, even with their incredibly sloppy practices, the lab results are credible in this case but they probably won't be in the future.
Uh, huh. Will the "crediblity" or the results be dependant on the nationality of the cyclist?
7
posted on
09/20/2007 11:17:09 AM PDT
by
jess35
To: SF Republican
Oh, sigh, I had really hoped he was innocent and tried to believe him. If it is indeed true (and the French have had their noses out of joint ever since Lance has been decisively owning ‘their’ sport), it’s a sad day for Tour fans, at least American fans. And allegations swirl around so many others, including Basso, Ullrich. Not Hincapie, though. Go George! They need to revamp the whole thing, start fresh.
8
posted on
09/20/2007 11:17:34 AM PDT
by
fortunecookie
(Finally catching up with posting...)
To: jess35
In other words, the test results were “fake, but accurate.”
Where have we heard that before?
9
posted on
09/20/2007 11:19:43 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
To: jess35
Uh, huh. Will the "crediblity" or the results be dependant on the nationality of the cyclist?It certainly seems so, at least for Americans and American teams.
"If such practises continue, it may well be that in the future, an error like this could result in the dismissal" of a positive finding by the lab.
The French don't seem even the slightest bit bothered by the abject sloppiness of their whole inquisition investigation.
10
posted on
09/20/2007 11:20:38 AM PDT
by
fortunecookie
(Finally catching up with posting...)
To: stratboy
It was high levels of testosterone in Landis’ case that did him in.
In the case of steroids that add muscle mass it sure helps make those mountains easier when you have a 28” waist and glutes the size of a Sequoia tree. The extra ten pounds of muscle the steroids built only helps them climb better.
This was the first year in many that I didn't even follow the tour. It is a shame.
11
posted on
09/20/2007 11:28:06 AM PDT
by
Cagey
(Many go fishing all their lives without knowing that it is not fish they are after.......Thoreau)
To: Vision
I beat this thread by 6-6 minutes but it was pulled.
12
posted on
09/20/2007 11:32:41 AM PDT
by
moonman
To: SF Republican
I don’t know who to believe any more...it just seems like one big mess. This has got to be just killing the sport though.
13
posted on
09/20/2007 11:39:22 AM PDT
by
Gator101
(Don't tazer me, Bro!)
To: stratboy
steroids are good for recovery after intense physical efforts.
You're the first person I've heard say that synthetic testosterone can have immediate results as would have been required in Landis's case. Everything else said this drugs took weeks to work.
14
posted on
09/20/2007 11:42:01 AM PDT
by
Vision
("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
To: Gator101
I think the French have a saying “Lying is just talking”
To: SF Republican
["...the 2006 Tour de France champion used synthetic testosterone to fuel his spectacular comeback victory.."]
There's a shocker!
16
posted on
09/20/2007 12:50:57 PM PDT
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(Elections have consequences.)
To: Vision; SF Republican
You beat me by seconds. Then have him tested for steroids!
17
posted on
09/20/2007 1:16:10 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: stratboy
"That impossible 30 minute gap he made up sure is easier to believe if steroids are involved."
He didn't make up a 30 minute gap. I believe he was 8-9 minutes off the pace before that stage, and made up about 7-7 1/2 minutes of it. He made up the rest during the final time trial.
The guy who made up 30 minutes in one stage was Oscar Pereiro, who finished second and will probably be named the winner. Both in the case of Pereiro and landis, you can argue that much of winning gap was of poor strategy by the rest of the peloton. (Periero was not alone when he made up the 30 minutes; I believe he was part of a breakaway of four or five riders, that the peleton carelessly let go.)
18
posted on
09/20/2007 1:47:00 PM PDT
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: Cagey
How can taking steroids for one day have any impact on the next day's performance. This has never made sense, because taking a sterois for a single day, would not impact one's performance.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson