Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

“I do not believe that Saint Thomas Aquinas was compromising or rationalizing. Where interpretation of scripture and reality conflict I am afraid that it is the interpretation that must really be called into question.”

Thomas Aquinas was Roman Catholic. In my post I clearly specified “Conservative, Evangelical, and Protestant.” Not to insult Roman Catholics, but to exclude them because of the stands taken by their hierarchy. I already knew how most RCs feel, and it wasn’t my intention to quarrel with one. And it still isn’t. My post was directed at liked minded evangelicals.


82 posted on 09/25/2007 7:23:16 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: Sola Veritas
My point stands despite doctrinal differences. The majority of Christendom throughout history has not adopted a literal interpretation of scripture. Neither does the Jewish faith see belief in Genesis as a contradiction towards acceptance of scientific evidence about the age of the earth, the universe, life and humanity.
83 posted on 09/25/2007 8:07:00 PM PDT by allmendream (A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal. (Hunter08))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson