To: from occupied ga
I don’t know if I’d go so far as to call him a gun grabber, but I definitely agree that he shouldn’t be on the board. It’s pretty clear to me that the GOA soundbite is a misrepresentation of what he was trying to say. The problem is, I don’t like the corrected version of what he was trying to say all that much either.
He should be dropped for stupidity if nothing else.But just because he said something idiotic doesn't mean it's NRA policy.
31 posted on
09/20/2007 5:15:41 AM PDT by
tcostell
(MOLON LABE)
To: tcostell
The GOA better wake up to the fact if they damage the NRA, the GOA’s membership doesn’t go up. People who are turned off by organizations don’t rush to the competition. They simply quit.
Without the NRA, the GOA still can’t accomplish anything. They haven’t done a thing by themselves since I started asking five years ago.
32 posted on
09/20/2007 5:23:23 AM PDT by
Shooter 2.5
(NRA - Hunter '08)
To: tcostell
I dont know if Id go so far as to call him a gun grabberWell, he says that full auto is only for the polce and military. In my definition that makes him a gun grabber. Where do you draw the line where some guns are OK and other aren't?
40 posted on
09/20/2007 5:49:49 AM PDT by
from occupied ga
(Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson