Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: from occupied ga
I don’t know if I’d go so far as to call him a gun grabber, but I definitely agree that he shouldn’t be on the board. It’s pretty clear to me that the GOA soundbite is a misrepresentation of what he was trying to say. The problem is, I don’t like the corrected version of what he was trying to say all that much either.

He should be dropped for stupidity if nothing else.But just because he said something idiotic doesn't mean it's NRA policy.

31 posted on 09/20/2007 5:15:41 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: tcostell

The GOA better wake up to the fact if they damage the NRA, the GOA’s membership doesn’t go up. People who are turned off by organizations don’t rush to the competition. They simply quit.

Without the NRA, the GOA still can’t accomplish anything. They haven’t done a thing by themselves since I started asking five years ago.


32 posted on 09/20/2007 5:23:23 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5 (NRA - Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: tcostell
I don’t know if I’d go so far as to call him a gun grabber

Well, he says that full auto is only for the polce and military. In my definition that makes him a gun grabber. Where do you draw the line where some guns are OK and other aren't?

40 posted on 09/20/2007 5:49:49 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson