Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AFA-Michigan
>>>>So you want us sitting home, or not? Up to you.

Actually, I prefer my own choice. I prefer a candidate with enough skill, appeal and knowledge, like RR, that he can win without the Christian or Black votes, so he can say, “Look, I owe you nothing. You opposed me, so screw it. Next time be more practical.”

PS: The “Marriage Protection Amendment” isn’t even marginally important. Gays will do what they want, married or not. As a Conservative, my general feeling is that my opinion stops at the front door.

Seduce kids? Shoot ‘em.
Gay rape? Rape is rape.
Wear a dress? Why not look stupid like so many “fashionable” women so?
Demand special “rights” Hell no.
Get married? Why not? Why shouldn’t they be miserable like the rest of us.

BTW, “Gay Marriage” was not an issue launched by gays. It was quietly pushed by the “Matrimonial Bar” when they began to lose too much income to no-fault divorce.

When you follow the money, you follow the crime.

839 posted on 09/20/2007 3:28:36 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 in Vietnam meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 807 | View Replies ]


To: MindBender26

RWR was the president who brought the social conservatives to prominence. He wanted to amend the constitution to allow school prayer. He wanted to end abortion. He had no opinion on gay marriage because even 20 years ago it was a ridiculous notion. The notion that the social conservatives did not vote for Reagan is patently false.


842 posted on 09/20/2007 3:38:01 PM PDT by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 839 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson