Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: billbears
Marriage is only a moral issue as long as it stayed a covenant. Marriage is protected because it is the foundation of our country and our culture, as is family. That protection makes it a legal issue.

Not having a Federal Marriage Amendment leaves rogue state citizens at the states mercy, and mercy they will not get. When families are broken down, so is society and the country. Government has a vested interest in preventing that from happening. It also has a vested interest in seeing to it that each state remains a Representative Government, as the Constitution dictates. When States or courts determine these issues, the public is not represented, thus such action is unconstitutional. That is when the Fed. govt should step in and tell that state there actions are unconstitutional.

215 posted on 09/19/2007 8:47:03 PM PDT by gidget7 ( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: gidget7
I realize social 'conservatives' have no use for the Constitution, except perhaps to wield it over others for a short period of time. Of course any Amendment limiting the rights of others (i.e. the 18th Amendment) would be overturned in short order. The Constitution was originally designed to limit the federal government alone and not meant to deal with moral issues that may arise.
256 posted on 09/19/2007 9:04:54 PM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson