Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rather Files $70 Million Lawsuit Against CBS
New York Times ^ | September 19, 2007 | JACQUES STEINBERG

Posted on 09/19/2007 12:30:52 PM PDT by abb

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-250 next last
To: abb

Soon Dan will be videotaped wrestling with CBS Security and screaming “DON’T TAZE ME MAN!”


121 posted on 09/19/2007 1:35:34 PM PDT by Hacklehead (I'm not here to make friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

Posted by Howlin to hole_n_one
On News/Activism 04/22/2007 5:11:32 AM EDT · 1,634 of 18,392

ROFLMAO!

Most recent Post....... ???


122 posted on 09/19/2007 1:35:48 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Hillary's color is yellow.....how appropriate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: elizabetty

“Does this open the door for Rather to be questioned on his methods of “research” and “confirmation” and “sources” in the TANG story?”

Yeah, lots of interesting subplots to this one. It’ll be interesting just to see how the MSM plays this one. Probably only covered on Fox. They’ll find some moonbat to take Dan’s side. Colmes isn’t going to know whether sh*t or wind his watch - to borrow a phrase.


123 posted on 09/19/2007 1:37:23 PM PDT by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: abb
CBS should be more careful with regard to those to whom they offer on-air employment.
124 posted on 09/19/2007 1:39:14 PM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hacklehead

“Soon Dan will be videotaped wrestling with CBS Security and screaming “DON’T TAZE ME MAN!””

“BRO”, “Don’t taze me, bro”. It’s only been a day for Pete’s sake.


125 posted on 09/19/2007 1:39:40 PM PDT by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: freedomdefender

Kenneth? That you?


126 posted on 09/19/2007 1:39:46 PM PDT by Piranha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

“This should be fun to see how and if CBS decides to defend itself.”

Well, don’t that just dip your hat in the creek.


127 posted on 09/19/2007 1:41:01 PM PDT by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: abb

The lawsuit is going to sweep through CBS/Viacom like a Texas tornado on a hot summer afternoon...


128 posted on 09/19/2007 1:41:49 PM PDT by gridlock (I do not support Hillary Clinton because I am afraid of strong women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

This lawsuit is as thin as a bar of soap after five days washin’.


129 posted on 09/19/2007 1:42:13 PM PDT by mom.mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Sure, the jury can find that CBS violated Dandy Boy’s contract and award Dummy Danny $0.02.


130 posted on 09/19/2007 1:42:38 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: abb

....better than sex.


131 posted on 09/19/2007 1:43:02 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

RED on RED. Brings to mind the Soviets fighting the Nazis or Iran-Iraq. Or Colts-Cowboys.


132 posted on 09/19/2007 1:45:34 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: abb

Ok, I haven’t seen this yet.......It’s Bush’s fault.


133 posted on 09/19/2007 1:46:07 PM PDT by Danette ("If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

134 posted on 09/19/2007 1:46:11 PM PDT by Alouette (Vicious Babushka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
Simple,

Our news reader started making up the news, was an embarrasment to CBS and had to be dismissed. Because of his long service to CBS, we tried to handle the matter in a manner that would permit Mr. Rather to save face. We have been repaid for our kindness with this meritless lawsuit. Our countersuit is being drafted.

CBS

135 posted on 09/19/2007 1:47:22 PM PDT by Agent Smith (Fallujah delenda est. (I wish))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

A refresher on CBS findings from Michelle Malkin:

Going back to the Thornburgh report, I remind you of two telling, key phrases: “Myopic zeal.” “Rigid and blind.”

And a refresher on the top 10 news-gathering and news-vetting failures identified by the panel:

1. The failure to obtain clear authentication of any of the Killian documents from any document examiner;

2. The false statement in the September 8 Segment that an expert had authenticated the Killian documents when all he had done was authenticate one signature from one document used in the Segment;

3. The failure of 60 Minutes Wednesday management to scrutinize the publicly available, and at times controversial, background of the source of the documents, retired Texas Army National Guard Lieutenant Colonel Bill Burkett;

4. The failure to find and interview the individual who was understood at the outset to be Lieutenant Colonel Burkett’s source of the Killian documents, and thus to establish the chain of custody;

5. The failure to establish a basis for the statement in the Segment that the documents “were taken from Colonel Killian’s personal files”;

6. The failure to develop adequate corroboration to support the statements in the Killian documents and to carefully compare the Killian documents to official TexANG records, which would have identified, at a minimum, notable inconsistencies in content and format;

7. The failure to interview a range of former National Guardsmen who served with Lieutenant Colonel Killian and who had different perspectives about the documents;

8. The misleading impression conveyed in the Segment that Lieutenant Strong had authenticated the content of the documents when he did not have the personal knowledge to do so;

9. The failure to have a vetting process capable of dealing effectively with the production speed, significance and sensitivity of the Segment; and

10. The telephone call prior to the Segment’s airing by the producer of the Segment to a senior campaign official of Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry - a clear conflict of interest - that created the appearance of a political bias.

Myopic zeal. Rigid and blind.

The more things change, the more Dan Rather stays the same.


136 posted on 09/19/2007 1:47:27 PM PDT by teddyballgame (red man in a blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Yes.


137 posted on 09/19/2007 1:47:44 PM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: abb

I doubt that CBS even has $70 million at this point.

They should counter-sue Rather, claiming that he faked the TANG report, and brought disrepute on the network.


138 posted on 09/19/2007 1:50:23 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Popcorn!


139 posted on 09/19/2007 1:50:46 PM PDT by Earthdweller (All reality is based on faith in something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJL

I love liberal on liberal attacks. Who is making the popcorn?


140 posted on 09/19/2007 1:51:51 PM PDT by ChinaThreat (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-250 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson