Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

I’ve always been interested in the term “genocide” and often wonder why the word isn’t preceeded by the word “attempted”, as genocide alone would seem to mean that there are none left.


6 posted on 09/19/2007 5:11:28 AM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All

THE BEST WEBSITE ABOUT THE AMERICAN WEST
Gathering all the best American historians on the subject

http://custer.over-blog.com

AND THIS ARTICLE

“The genocide myth”

http://custer.over-blog.com/article-11602057.html


7 posted on 09/19/2007 5:13:18 AM PDT by drzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: metesky
Quite. In fact, the native population of North America is higher today that it was at the time of the American revolution.

Primitive hunter gatherer societies cannot support dense populations. Never have, anywhere in the world. Nomadic herdsmen have denser populations, and new stone age farmers have an order of magnitude larger populations, let alone modern industrial societies.

The ones that disease did not carry off were simply inundated by far more numerous members of a more advanced civilization. Which they were perfectly able to join, and most eventually did so.

44 posted on 09/19/2007 6:19:40 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson