It is obvious from your post that you have not actually read the Diaz account.
Read it and stop having mid and late 20th century socialist and Marixst revisionist historians be the only source for your opinions.
Out.
>> mid and late 20th century socialist and Marixst revisionist historians <<
BWAA-HAA-HAA-HA-HA-HAA-HA-HAAA!!! Oh, Puh-LEEZE! The National Review is just stacked full of socialist and Marxist revisionist historians!!! HA-HAA-HAA!!! Ho, ho, ho, HAA-HAA HAAAAA HAAAAA!!!