Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Greg F

“Yah, but Mattels self-interest wouldn’t be helped by toys with lead paint either . . . but they still didn’t do enough quality control . . .”

Just because Mattel ignored QC issues, I don’t see how you can infer that Boeing does as well. With Boeing, the survival of their company depends primarily on one product -expensive aircraft, not hundreds of different low-cost products. Consequently QC has a much higher level of importance to Boeing than it does for a toy manufacturer. I don’t see any evidence that Boeing has shirked their QC responsibilities, nor would I expect them to given the nature of their business. I can however see a toy company like Mattel ignoring QC issues.


20 posted on 09/18/2007 10:00:57 AM PDT by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Kirkwood

I agree with you. I trust Boeing, I suppose, in this. There will always be trade offs in efficiency, safety in cost though.


24 posted on 09/18/2007 10:07:07 AM PDT by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson